Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research

Center for Asian Public Opinion Research & Collaboration Initiative (충남대학교 아시아여론조사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Unraveling the Web of Health Misinformation: Exploring the Characteristics, Emotions, and Motivations of Misinformation During the COVID-19 Pandemic

  • Received : 2023.11.01
  • Accepted : 2024.02.28
  • Published : 2024.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The proliferation of health misinformation gained momentum amidst the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). People stuck in their homes, without work pressure, regardless of health concerns towards personal, family, or peer groups, consistently demanded information. People became engaged with misinformation while attempting to find health information content. This study used the content analysis method and analyzed 1,154 misinformation stories from four prominent signatories of the International Fact-Checking Network during the pandemic. The study finds the five main categories of misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. These are 1) the severity of the virus, 2) cure, prevention, and treatment, 3) myths and rumors about vaccines, 4) health authorities' guidelines, and 5) personal and social impacts. Various sub-categories supported the content characteristics of these categories. The study also analyzed the emotional valence of health misinformation. It was found that misinformation containing negative sentiments got higher engagement during the pandemic. Positive and neutral sentiment misinformation has less reach. Surprise, fear, and anger/aggressive emotions highly affected people during the pandemic; in general, people and social media users warning people to safeguard themselves from COVID-19 and creating a confusing state were found as the primary motivation behind the propagation of misinformation. The present study offers valuable perspectives on the mechanisms underlying the spread of health-related misinformation amidst the COVID-19 outbreak. It highlights the significance of discerning the accuracy of information and the feelings it conveys in minimizing the adverse effects on the well-being of public health.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmad, T., AliagaLazarte, E. A., & Mirjalili, S. (2022). A systematic literature review on fake news in the COVID-19 pandemic: Can AI propose a solution? Applied Sciences, 12(24), Article 12727. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122412727
  2. Alvi. I, & Saraswat, N. (2020). Information processing- heuristic vs systematic and susceptibility of sharing covid-19 related fake news on social media. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 12(6), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.20/06
  3. Atlani-Duault, L., Ward, J. K., Roy, M., Morin, C., & Wilson, A. (2020). Tracking online heroisation and blame in epidemics. The Lancet Public Health, 5(3), Article e137-e138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30033-5
  4. Awan, T. M., Aziz, M., Sharif, A., Ch, T. R., Jasam, T., & Alvi, Y. (2022). Fake news during the pandemic times: A Systematic Literature Review using PRISMA. Open Information Science, 6(1), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1515/opis-2022-0131
  5. Basch, C. H., Hillyer, G. C., Meleo-Erwin, Z. C., Jaime, C., Mohlman, J., &Basch, C. E. (2020). Preventive behaviours conveyed on YouTube to mitigate transmission of COVID-19: A cross-sectional study. JMIR public health and surveillance, 6(2), Article e18807. https://doi.org/10.2196/18807
  6. Charquero-Ballester, M., Walter, J. G., Nissen, I. A., & Bechmann, A. (2021). Different types of COVID-19 misinformation have different emotional valence on Twitter. Big Data & Society, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211041279
  7. Chou, W. Y. S., Gaysynsky, A., & Vanderpool, R. C. (2021). The COVID-19 misinfodemic: Moving beyond fact-checking. Health Education & Behavior, 48(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198120980675
  8. Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology, 40, 3-35. https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40222518
  9. Guarino, S., Pierri, F., Di Giovanni, M., and Celestini, A. (2021). Information disorders during the COVID-19 infodemic: The case of Italian Facebook. Online Social Networks and Media, 22, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2021.100124
  10. Gupta, S., Sharma, J., Najm, M., Sharma, S. (2020). Media exaggeration and information credibility: Qualitatively analysis of fear generation for Covid-19 using NVIVO. Journal of Content, Community and Communication, 12(6), 14-20. https://doi.org/10.31620/JCCC.12.20/03
  11. Hansson, S., Orru, K., Torpan, S., Ba ck, A., Kazemekaityte, A., Meyer, S. F., Ludvigsen, J., Savadori, L, Galvagni, A., & Pigre e, A. (2021). COVID-19 information disorder: Six types of harmful information during the pandemic in Europe. Journal of Risk Research, 24(3-4), 380-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1871058
  12. Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The marketing review, 3(4), 479-498. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934703771910080
  13. Islam, M. S., Sarkar, T., Khan, S. H., Kamal, A. H. M., Hasan, S. M., Kabir, A., Yeasmin, D., Islam, M. A., Chowdhury, K. I. A., Anwar, K. S., Chughtai, A. A., & Seale, H. (2020). COVID-19-related Infodemic and its impact on public health: A global social media analysis. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 103(4), 1621-1629. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.20-0812
  14. Islam, M. S., Kamal, A. H. M., Kabir, A., Southern, D. L., Khan, S. H., Hasan, S. M., Sarkar, T., Sharmin, S., Das, S., Roy, T., Harun, M. G. D., Chughtai, A. A., Homaira, N. & Seale, H. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence. PloS one, 16(5), e0251605. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251605
  15. Ittefaq, M., Hussain, S. A., & Fatima, M. (2020). COVID-19 and social-politics of medical misinformation on social media in Pakistan. Media Asia, 47(1-2), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2020.1817264
  16. Kanozia, R., Kaur, S., & Arya, R. (2021). Infodemic during the COVID-19 lockdown in India. Media Asia, 48(1), 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2021.1881286
  17. Kusen, E., & Strembeck, M. (2018). Politics, sentiments, and misinformation: An analysis of the Twitter discussion on the 2016Austrian presidential elections. Online Social Networks and Media 5, 37-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2017.12.002
  18. Lee, C. (2020). #HateIsAVirus: Talking about COVID-19 'hate'. Viral Discourse. https://viraldiscourse.com/2020/05/19/hateisavirus-talking-about-covid19-hate/
  19. MacFarlane, D., Hurlstone, M. J., & Ecker, U. K. (2020). Protecting consumers from fraudulent health claims: A taxonomy of psychological drivers, interventions, barriers, and treatments. Social Science & Medicine, 259, Article 112790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.112790
  20. Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), Article 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
  21. Naidoo, R. (2020). A multi-level influence model of COVID-19 themed cybercrime. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(3), 306-321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1771222
  22. Nguyen, C. T. (2020). Echo chambers and epistemic bubbles. Episteme,17(2),141-161. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2018.32
  23. Nickerson, R. S. (1998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2(2), 175-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
  24. O'Brien, M., Moore, K., & McNicholas, F. (2020). Social media spread during Covid-19: The pros and cons of likes and shares. Ir Med J, 113(4), 52.
  25. Poynter Institute. (2020). The international fact-checking network. https://www.poynter.org/ifcn/
  26. Romer, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (2020). Conspiracy theories as barriers to controlling the spread of COVID-19 in the US. Soc. Sci. Med., 263, Article 113356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113356
  27. Sallam, M., Dababseh, D., Eid, H., Al-Mahzoum, K., Al-Haidar, A., Taim, D., Yaseen, A., Ababneh, N. A., Bakri, F. G., & Mahafzah, A. (2021). High rates of COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and its association with conspiracy beliefs: a study in Jordan and Kuwait among other Arab countries. Vaccines, 9(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9010042
  28. Shahi, G. K., Dirkson, A., & Majchrzak, T. A. (2021). An exploratory study of COVID-19 misinformation on Twitter. Online social networks and media, 22, Article 100104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100104
  29. Shahsavari, S., Holur, P., Wang, T., Tangherlini, T.R., & Roychowdhury, V. (2020). Conspiracy in the time of Corona: Automatic detection of emerging COVID-19 conspiracy theories in social media and the news. J. Comput Soc. Sci, 3(2), 279-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-020-00086-5
  30. Talamanca, G. F., & Arfini, S. (2022). Through the newsfeed glass: Rethinking filter bubbles and echo chambers. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00494-z
  31. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
  32. Wang, Y., McKee, M., Torbica, A., & Stuckler, D. (2019). Systematic literature review on the spread of health-related misinformation on social media. Social science & medicine, 240, 112552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112552
  33. World Health Organization. (2020). Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Situation Report - 13. https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/situation-report---13
  34. Zarocostas, J. (2020). World report how to fight an infodemic. Lancet, 395(10225), 676. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X