DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes in Electrical Characteristics and Crop Yields of Agricultural Solar Systems Based on Module Installation Environment

모듈의 설치환경에 따른 영농형 태양광 시스템 전기적 특성 및 작물 생산량 변화

  • Seok Jin Jang (Department of Future Energy Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Jinjoo Park (Department of Energy Convergence Engineering, Cheongju University) ;
  • Youngkuk Kim (College of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Junsin Yi (College of Information and Communication Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 장석진 (미래에너지공학과, 성균관대학교) ;
  • 박진주 (에너지융합공학과, 청주대학교) ;
  • 김영국 (정보통신대학, 성균관대학교) ;
  • 이준신 (정보통신대학, 성균관대학교)
  • Received : 2025.10.14
  • Accepted : 2025.11.25
  • Published : 2025.12.31

Abstract

Agricultural solar systems are highly space efficient systems that enable simultaneous agricultural and power production on the same farmland. The amount of solar radiation reaching the ground surface and the degree of shading generated vary depending on the conditions of the installed modules, necessitating precise design. Using PVSYST simulation, we analyze the module's power output, the solar radiation reaching the ground surface, and the PPFD and DLI while varying the module installation angle, azimuth angle, and the installation distance (pitch) between modules to predict the relative crop yield Results show that increasing tilt angle strongly improves ground PPFD/DLI by reducing ground shadow and enlarging sky and ground view factors. Higher tilted angle (60-90°) makes higher irradiance on the bottom ground and higher crop production. 30-45°. Wider pitch (≈6-10 m) further mitigates shading, lifting DLI to ≥20 mol/m2·day across the growing season. The recommended envelope for Korean agrivoltaics is high-tilt (≥ 60°) with ≥6 m pitch, balancing crop preservation and power output.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by grants from the New and Renewable Energy Technology Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) funded by the Korean Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE) (No, RS-2024-00457351).

References

  1. S. Aslam, H. Herodotou, S. M. Mohsin, N. Javaid, N. Ashraf, S. Aslam, A survey on deep learning methods for power load and renewable energy forecasting in smart microgrids. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 144, 110992 (2022).
  2. S. R. Paramati, U. Shahzad, B. Doğan, The role of environmental technology for energy demand and energy efficiency: Evidence from OECD countries. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 153, 111735 (2022).
  3. B.J. van Ruijven, E. De Cian, I.S. Wing, Wing, Amplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change. Nat. Commun. 10(1), 2762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10399-3
  4. Q. Hassan, S. Algburi, A. Z. Sameen, T. J. Al-Musawi, A. K. Al-Jiboory, H. M. Salman, B. M. Ali, M. Jaszczur, A comprehensive review of international renewable energy growth. Energy Built Environ. 12(3), 111875, (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbenv.2023.12.002
  5. K. Dissanayake, D. Kularatna-Abeywardana, A review of supercapacitors: Materials, technology, challenges, and renewable energy applications. J. Energy Storage 96, 112563 (2024).
  6. Y. F. Nassar, H. J. El-Khozondar, M. Elnaggar, F. F. El-Batta, R. J. El-Khozondar, S. Y. Alsadi, Renewable energy potential in the State of Palestine: Proposals for sustainability. Renew. Energy Focus 49, 100576 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2024.100576
  7. E. F. Dhata, C. K. Kim, H.-G. Kim, Probabilistic approach for site-adaptation and economic performance estimation of a photovoltaic project in South Korea. Energy Strategy Rev. 54, 101487 (2024).
  8. P. Bórawski, L. Holden, A. Bełdycka-Bórawska, Perspective of photovoltaic energy market development in the european union. Energy 270, 126804 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.126804
  9. Y. Majeed, M. U. Khan, M. Waseem, U. Zahid, F. Mahmood, F. Majeed, M. Sultan, A. Raza, Renewable energy as an alternative source for energy management in agriculture. Energy Rep. 10, 344-359 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.06.032
  10. H. J. Kim, G. Y. Yang, C. R. Nam, S. H. Jeong, S. P. Jung, Solar photovoltaic industry in Korea: current status and perspective. J Korean Soc Environ Eng. 45, 107-118 (2023). https://doi.org/10.4491/KSEE.2023.45.2.107
  11. S. Gorjian, M. Ebadi, A. A. Jamshidi, M. Ahmadi, A. Arabkoohsar, Technological advancements and research prospects of innovative concentration agrivoltaics. Appl. Energy 337, 120799 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120799
  12. M. Kang, S. Sohn, J. Park, J. Kim, S.-W. Choi, S. Cho, Agro-Environmental Observation in a Rice Paddy under an Agrivoltaic System: Comparison with the Environment outside the System. Korea Journal of Agriculture and Forest Meteorology 23, 141-148 (2021).
  13. J. Bai, Y. Wang, H. Liu, X. Zhang, A device for enhancing the irradiance of bifacial photovoltaic modules and its tracking algorithm. Sol. Energy 298, 113731 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2025.113731
  14. A. Parretta, A. Sarno, R. Brillante, V. Tortora, Effects of solar irradiation conditions on the outdoor performance of photovoltaic modules. Opt. Commun. 153(1-3), 153-163 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-4018(98)00192-8
  15. N. Anani, M. A. Al-Kouz, A. A. Al-Salaymeh, Variations of PV module parameters with irradiance and temperature. Energy Peocedia 134, 276-285 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.09.617
  16. K. Kurokawa, K. Otani, M. Matsumoto, Data analysis on solar irradiance and performance characteristics of solar modules with a test facility of various tilted angles and directions. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells. 67(1-3), 591-600 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0927-0248(00)00331-7
  17. V. Prakash, A. Kumar, R. Singh, S. Sharma, Shading and PAR under different density agrivoltaic system, their simulation and effect on wheat production. Eur. J. Agron. 149, 126922 (2023).
  18. A. Sarr, R. Masson, L. F. Rodrigues, G. Notton, Agrivoltaic, a synergistic co-location of agricultural and energy production in perpetual mutation: A comprehensive review. Processed 11, 948 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/pr11030948
  19. S. M. Lu, Y. Zhang, H. Wang, Photosynthetically active radiation decomposition models for agrivoltaics. Sol. Energy 244, 536-549 (2022).
  20. B.-M. Kim, Y.-J. Lee, J.-H. Park, S.-J. Kim, Growth and agronomic traits of green onion under the agrovoltaic system with red supplemental LED lighting. J. People Plants Environ 26, 1-8 (2023). https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2023.26.1.1
  21. H. Jo, Y. Lee, S. Kim, J. Park, Comparison of yield components of several crops grown under agro-photovoltaic system in Korea. Agriculture 12, 619 (2022).
  22. M. H. Riaz, H. Imran, A. J. Riaz, D. C. Y. Foo, Module technology for Agrivoltaics: Vertical Bifacial Versus Tilted Monofacial Farms. IEEE J. Photovolt. 11, 2 (2021).
  23. S. Touil, A. Benatiallah, A. Harrouni, Shading effect of Photovoltaic panels on horticulture crops production: a mini review. Rev. Environ. Sci. Bio/Technol. 20, 281-296 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-021-09572-2
  24. X. Hou, J. Kleissl, Potential electricity production of vertical solar photovoltaic array. ASES Solar 2023, 80-86 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39147-7
  25. M. A. Kallioglu, H. K. Ozturk, Solar collector tilt angle optimization for agrivoltaics. Case Stud. Therm. Eng. 54, 103998 (2024).
  26. P. E. Campana, A. Stridh, J. Amaducci, Optimisation of vertically mounted agrivoltaic systems. J. Cleaner Prod. 352, 129091 (2021).
  27. M. S. Ahmed, R. Haque, S. M. A. Rahman, Agrivoltaics analysis in a techno-economic framework: Understanding why agrivoltaics on rice will always be profitable. Appl. Energy 323, 119560 (2022).
  28. M. Cossu, A. Ledda, A. Deligios, M. Sirigu, Increasing the agricultural sustainability of closed agrivoltaic system with the integration of vertical farming: A case study baby-leaf lettuce. Appl. Energy 344, 121278 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121278
  29. F. Sheikhi, J. E. Faust, R. Lopez, Trait component analysis of lettuce in response to daily light integrals at two growth stages. Agrosyst., Geosci. Environ. 7(4), e20579 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/agg2.v7.4
  30. M. Zhang, Y. Li, Q. Wang, X. Liu, The impact of daily light integral from artificial liggting on tomato seeding cultivation in plant factory. Agronomy 15(1), 70 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy15010070
  31. A. Weselek, T. Ehmann, I. Lewandowski, Agrivoltaic system impacts on microclimate and yield of different crops within an organic crop rotation in a temperate climate. Agron. Sustainable Dev. 41(5), 59 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00714-y
  32. W. Gong, Y. Li, Z. Chen, H. Wang, Regulatory effect of agriphotovoltaic systems with different panel heights on the thermal environment. Sci. Rep. 15, 11196 (2025).