DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors shaping the identity of South Korean college students during the COVID-19 pandemic: Does the "college experience" matter?

  • Received : 2025.01.09
  • Accepted : 2025.02.10
  • Published : 2025.02.28

Abstract

This research analyzes the effect of online instruction and the resulting lack of an in-person campus experience during the COVID-19 pandemic on the importance of one's university for college students' identity. While previous research, mainly from the United States, underlines the importance of the "college experience" for fostering strong connections between university students and their alma mater, much less is known about the mechanisms at play in other academic systems. Using a sample of students from a South Korean university-Yonsei University Mirae Campus-that switched to exclusively online instruction in March 2020 and stayed entirely online for four consecutive semesters, we explore the importance of college experience for students' identity. We compare the importance of their university and their department for students with and without in-person campus experience using two-sample hypothesis testing as well as ordered probit regressions, and find no differences between the two groups and no effects of the length of a student's offline experience on the importance of their alma mater for their identity. These findings limit the scope of the social interaction thesis for university students' identity formation and underline the importance of further research on the topic, drawing on data from non-U.S. contexts and diverse academic systems.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work has been supported by Ministry of Education and National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2022S1A5C2A03091469).

References

  1. 이건만. (2007). 한국사회의 학벌주의와 계급갈등: 학벌자본의 이론화를 향해. 교육사회학연구, 17(4), 53-85.
  2. 임희성. (2014). 통계로 본 학벌사회. 대학교육연구소.
  3. 전은희. (2017). 학벌주의 정체성에 대한 내러티브적 이해: 서울대생의 사례를 중심으로. 교육인류학연구, 20(3), 103-148. https://doi.org/10.17318/JAE.2017.20.3.004
  4. Archer, L., Hutchings, M., & Ross, A. (2003). Higher education and social class: Issues of exclusion and inclusion. Routledge.
  5. Armstrong, E. A., & Hamilton, L. T. (2013). Paying for the party: How college maintains inequality. Harvard University Press.
  6. Arnett, J. J. (2004). Emerging adulthood: The winding road from the late teens through the twenties. Oxford University Press.
  7. Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20-39. https://doi.org/10.2307/258189
  8. Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
  9. Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. University of California Press.
  10. Bonanno, G. A. (2004). Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? American Psychologist, 59(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.
  12. Brown, L., & Holloway, I. (2008). The adjustment journey of international postgraduate students at an English university: An ethnographic study. Journal of Research in International Education, 7(2), 232–249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475240908091306
  13. Buchmann, C., & DiPrete, T. A. (2006). The growing female advantage in college completion: The role of family background and academic achievement. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 515–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100401
  14. Burge, E. J., Gibson, C. C., & Gibson, T. (2017). Flexible pedagogy, flexible practice: Notes from the trenches of distance education. Athabasca University Press.
  15. Byun, S., Schofer, E., & Kim, K. K. (2012). Revisiting the role of cultural capital in East Asian educational systems: The case of South Korea. Sociology of Education, 85(3), 219–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038040712447180
  16. Coté, J. E., & Levine, C. (2002). Identity formation, agency, and culture: A social psychological synthesis. Psychology Press.
  17. Choi, H. (2018). Education as meritocracy: The struggle for elite status in South Korea. Asian Journal of Comparative Education, 3(2), 84–101.
  18. Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1), 91-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
  19. Di Battista, S., Smith, H., Mongelli, L., & Berti, C. (2023). Students' university identification: An exploratory study in the United States and Italy. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(1).
  20. Drezner, N. D. (2018). Philanthropic mirroring: Exploring identity-based fundraising in higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(3), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2017.1368818
  21. Ellemers, N., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2002). Self and social identity. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 161-186. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135228
  22. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. W. W. Norton.
  23. Etzelmueller, K. L. (2014). Organizational Identification in Alumni Relations. Marquette University College of Professional Studies Professional Projects, Paper 71. Available at https://epublications.marquette.edu/cps_professional/71/, last accessed on October 11, 2024.
  24. Eckstein, Harry. (1975). Case Study and Theory in Political Science.In Fred I. Greenstein and Nelson W. Polsby, eds. Handbook of Political Science, Vol.1, Political Science: Scope and Theory. Addison-Wesley.
  25. Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7(2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202
  26. Fisher, G. G., Matthews, R. A., & Gibbons, A. M. (2016). Developing and investigating the use of single-item measures in organizational research. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 21(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039139
  27. Gerring, J. (2017). Case study research: Principles and practices (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
  28. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. New Jersey, 5(3), 207-219.
  29. Harman, D. (1967). A Single Factor Test of Common Method Variance. The Journal of Psychology, 35, 359-378.
  30. Haslam, S. A., Steffens, N. K., & Peters, K. (2022). Introducing and validating a single-item measure of identity leadership: The visual identity leadership scale (VILS). British Journal of Social Psychology, 61(3), 1012–1035.
  31. Houlden, S., & Veletsianos, G. (2021). The problem with flexible learning: Neoliberalism, freedom, and learner subjectivities. Learning, Media and Technology, 46(2), 144-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2020.1833920
  32. Jones, S. R. (2010). Constructing identities at the intersections: An autoethnographic exploration of multiple dimensions of identity. Journal of College Student Development, 51(6), 661-675.
  33. Kim, Y., & Kim, Y. (2020). University prestige and employment in South Korea: The role of organizational hiring patterns. Higher Education, 80(6), 1071–1091.
  34. Kim, H., Bessey, D. & Park, S. (2023). Connectivity in university education: Student satisfaction and performance amongst COVID-19 pandemic. Social Science Review, 54(1), 57-91.
  35. Koenig‐Lewis, N., Asaad, Y., Palmer, A., & Petersone, E. (2016). The effects of passage of time on alumni recall of 'student experience'. Higher Education Quarterly, 70(1), 59-80. https://doi.org/10.1111/hequ.12063
  36. Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
  37. Liddell, T. M., & Kruschke, J. K. (2018). Analyzing ordinal data with metric models: What could possibly go wrong? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 328–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.08.009
  38. Liu, D. W. Y., & Winder, B. (2014). Exploring foreign undergraduate students' experiences of university. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27(1), 42-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2012.736643
  39. Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  40. McAlexander, J. H., & Koenig, H. F. (2001). University experiences, the student-college relationship, and alumni support. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 10(3), 21-44. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n03_02
  41. Menold, N. (2020). Rating-scale labeling in online surveys: An experimental comparison of verbal and numeric rating scales with respect to measurement quality and respondents' cognitive processes. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 79-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729694
  42. Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement and the "laws" of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625–632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y
  43. O'Brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & quantity, 41, 673-690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
  44. O'Keeffe, P. (2013). A sense of belonging: Improving student retention. College Student Journal, 47(4), 605-613.
  45. Olsson, U. (2022). Power Properties of Ordinal Regression Models for Likert Type Data. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 27(1), Article 6.
  46. Park, H. (2013). "Re-evaluating Education in Japan and Korea: De-mystifying Stereotypes." Routledge.
  47. Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jans, L. (2013). A single-item measure of social identification: Reliability, validity, and utility. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 597–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12006
  48. Reid, A., & Purcell, L. (2004). The prestige of a university and its impact on identity. Journal of Higher Education, 75(5), 462-487.
  49. Rovai, A. P., & Jordan, H. M. (2004). Blended learning and sense of community: A comparative analysis with traditional and fully online graduate courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 5(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v5i2.192
  50. Rust, A. A., & Uys, C. S. (2014). The importance of a university identity for students and alumni: The case of the Cape Peninsula University of Technology, South Africa. Journal of Social Sciences, 40(1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2014.11893300
  51. Seth, M. (2002). Education fever: Society, politics, and the pursuit of schooling in South Korea. University of Hawai'i Press.
  52. Shin, J. C. (2012). Higher education development in Korea: Western university ideas, Confucian tradition, and economic development. Higher Education, 64(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-011-9480-5
  53. Stryker, S. (1980). Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version. Benjamin-Cummings Publishing.
  54. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33-47). Brooks/Cole.
  55. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Blackwell.
  56. Temple, P., Callender, C., Grove, L., & Kersh, N. (2014). Managing the student experience in higher education: Managing institutional cultures and identity. Higher Education Quarterly, 68(2), 160-174.
  57. Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: The role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680930210140257
  58. Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. University of Chicago Press.
  59. Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2011). Student engagement, identity, and learning outcomes. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(5), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2011.536968
  60. Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997). Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures? Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(2), 247–252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247