DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Developing Tools for Measuring the Economic Value of University Library Services

대학도서관 서비스의 경제적 가치측정 도구 개발에 관한 연구

  • 노경국 (수원여자대학교 도서관) ;
  • 송기호 (공주대학교 문헌정보교육과)
  • Received : 2025.02.24
  • Accepted : 2025.03.02
  • Published : 2025.03.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to develop a tool for measuring the value of university library services to demonstrate the efficiency and economic viability of university library operations. To achieve this, a tool was designed to assess the economic value of university library services by measuring users' Willingness to Pay (WTP) for various service items. The valuation method employed the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM), which is widely used for evaluating non-market goods, and both online and offline surveys were conducted. Among the 537 respondents, valid data from 348 participants were utilized to analyze WTP and apply it to develop an economic evaluation tool. The value measurement tool developed in this study is designed to present investment outcomes clearly in numerical terms through the calculation of Return on Investment (ROI). To validate the tool's effectiveness, it was applied to a university selected as the top-ranked institution in Group A of the 2023 university library evaluation. The results showed an ROI of 42.26% for University A and 65.03% for College A. This study is significant in that it establishes a foundation for enhancing the efficiency of university library operations and securing budgets.

본 연구의 목적은 대학도서관 운영의 효율성과 경제성을 입증하기 위해 대학도서관 서비스의 가치 측정 도구를 개발하는 데 있다. 이를 위해 대학도서관 서비스 항목에 대한 이용자의 지불 의사 금액(WTP)을 측정하여 경제적 가치를 평가할 수 있는 도구를 설계하였다. 가치측정에는 비시장재의 가치평가에서 널리 활용되는 조건부가치측정법을 적용하였으며, 온라인과 오프라인 설문조사를 병행하였다. 총 537명의 응답자 중 348명의 유효 데이터를 활용하여 대학도서관 서비스에 대한 WTP를 분석하고 이를 적용하여 경제성 평가도구를 개발하였다. 본 연구에서 개발한 가치측정 도구는 투자 결과를 수치화하여 명확히 제시할 수 있도록 ROI 산출 방식으로 설계되었다. 도구의 타당성을 검증하기 위해 2023년 대학도서관 평가에서 A그룹 최우수 대학으로 선정된 대학을 대상으로 가치를 측정한 결과, A대학은 42.26%, A전문대학은 65.03%의 ROI가 산출되었다. 본 연구는 대학도서관 운영의 효율성을 제고하고 예산 확보에 기여할 수 있는 기반을 마련했다는 점에서 의의를 갖는다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cha, Mi-Kyeong & Pyo Soon-hee (2008). A study on the development of enjoyment indicators of public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(4), 329-354. 10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.4.329
  2. Chai, Goo-Mook (2006). Social Welfare Research Methodology. paju: Yangseowon. 
  3. Cho, Jeong-Kwon (2019). A study on the determinants of the public library budget of South Korea: focused on macro and micro environments. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(3), 5-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.3.005
  4. Cho, Keum-Ju (2011). A study on the value of S children's library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 42(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.42.1.201103.51
  5. Jang, Joon-kyung (2012). A study on improving CVM analysis guidelines for preliminary feasibility studies. PIMAC, Korea Environmental Economics Association. Available: https://www.kdi.re.kr/research/reportView?&pub_no=13495
  6. Jeong, Woo-soo, Rim, Myung-hwan, & Sawng, Yeong-Wha (2008). A study on WTP of mobile telephone service using the contingent valuation method in Korea. Korean Management Science Review, 25(2), 43-55.
  7. Jun, Hong-joon, Yang, Dong-hoon, & Cho, Kwang-hee (2016). The effects of conservative accounting on earnings persistence and cost of capital: perspectives from prospect theory. Korean Academic Society of Business Adiministration, 2016(8), 3235-3267.
  8. Kang, Hyun-cheol (2013). A guide on the use of factor analysis in the assessment of construct validity. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 43(5), 587-594. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2013.43.5.587
  9. Kang, Mi-hee (2016) An analysis of economic value of children's library. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1), 305-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.2.201606.305
  10. Kim, Nam-ju, Park, Ji-Hoon, & Jeon, Sung-ae (2019). A Study on the Standardization of the CVM Survey Design for the Feasibility Study of Local Finance Investment Projects (Research report 2019-18). Korea Research Institute for Local Administration.
  11. Kim, Sun-ae (2008). A study on the user satisfaction and loyalty of university library users. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(3), 281-299. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.3.281
  12. Ko, Young-man, Chang, Ji-Sang, Sim, Won-sik, Pyo, Sun-hee, & Jeong, Hye-kyung (2009). A Study on Measuring the Economic Value of Public Libraries (11-1371000-000160-01). Ministry of Culture, Sports, and Tourism.
  13. Ko, Young-man, Pyo, Soon-Hee, & Shim, Won-Sik (2012). A pilot study of the economic valuation of academic libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 46(4), 61-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2012.46.4.061
  14. Korean Publishers Association (2020). 2012 Publishing Market Research Report. Available: http://kpa21.or.kr
  15. Korean Publishers Association (2023). 2022 Publishing Market Statistics Report (Amendment 5.2). Available: http://kpa21.or.kr
  16. Kwak, Sang-shin (2012). A verification on the reliability and validity of the Korea trade union density. Korean Association of Labor Studies, 18(2), 33-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.17005/kals.2012.18.2.33
  17. Lee, Kyeong-jin (2020). The influence factors on the numbers of visitors and reference room users of public libraries: based on the national libraries statistical data 2018. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(2), 105-125. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.105
  18. Library Act. Act No. 19592.
  19. Lim, Ji Young & Park, Chang-ki (2012). Statistical methods to control response bias in nursing activity surveys. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 42(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2012.42.1.48
  20. Minimum Wage Act. Act No. 17326.
  21. Park, Won-woo, Mah, Sung-Hyuck, Bae, Su-hyun, Ji, Seon-Young, Lee, Yoo-Woo, & Kim, Ja-Young (2020). Careless responding in surveys: detection methods and the impact of screening on research. Korea Business Review, 49(2), 331-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.17287/kmr.2020.49.2.331
  22. Pyo, Soon-hee (2006). A study on the measuring of the economic value of a public library. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 40(2), 243-261.  https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2006.40.2.243
  23. Pyo, Soon-hee (2012). The comparative study of public library valuation using CVM: case of the payment vehicles. Journal of Korean Society for Information Management, 29(2), 173-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2012.29.2.173
  24. Pyo, Soon-hee & Cha, Mi-Kyeong (2016). The study on the measuring the economic use value of the national assembly library services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 50(4), 121-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2016.50.4.121
  25. Pyo, Soon-hee & Jeong, Dong-Youl (2008). A study on the method of measuring the economic use value of public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 42(2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2008.42.2.209
  26. Shim, Won-sik (2010). Rethinking theoretical and practical issues of economic valuation of library services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 44(4), 231-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2010.44.4.231
  27. University Library Promotion Act. Act No. 18547.
  28. Won, Doo-hwan (2022). Estimation of the economic value of pumped storage power generation in Korea. Institute of Management and Economy Research. 13(1), 263-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.32599/apjb.13.1.202203.263
  29. Yoon, Sang-suk & Shin, Hyun-Jung (2010). The effect of substitute on WTA and WTP. Korean Journal of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, 22(4), 601-619. http://dx.doi.org/10.22172/cogbio.2010.22.4.010
  30. Aabø, S. (2005). Are public libraries worth their price? a contingent valuation study of Norwegian public libraries. New Library World, 106(11/12), 487-495. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800510634973
  31. Aabø, S. & Audunson, R. (2002). Rational choice and valuation of public libraries: can economic models for evaluating non-market goods be applied to public libraries? Journal of Library and Information Science, 34(1), 5-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000024245070
  32. Aabø, S. & Strand, J. (2004). Public library valuation, nonuse values, and altruistic motivations. Library & Information Science Research, 26(3), 351-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2004.01.003
  33. Debono, B. (2002). Assessing the social impact of public libraries: what the literature is saying. Australasian Public Libraries and Information Services, 15(2), 80-95.
  34. Griffiths, J. M., King, D. W., & Lynch, T. (2004). Taxpayer Return on Investment in Florida Public Libraries: Summary Report. Florida Department of State, Division of Library and Information Serviices.
  35. Harless, D. W. & Allen, F. R. (1999). Using the contingent valuation method to measure patron benefits of reference desk service in an academic library. College & Research Libraries, 60(1), 56-69. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.60.1.56
  36. Holt, G. E., Elliott, D., & Moore, A. (1999). Placing a value on public library services. Public Libraries, 38(2), 98-108.
  37. Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Adamowicz, W. (Vic), Bennett, J., Brouwer, R., Cameron, T. A., Hanemann, W. M., Hanley, N., Ryan, M., Scarpa, R., Tourangeau, R., & Vossler, C. A. (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental & Resource Economists, 4(2), 319-405. https://doi.org/10.1086/691697
  38. Poll, R. (2003). Measuring impact and outcome of libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 4(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040310471202