Advanced Industrial SCIence (산업과 과학)

Convergence Society for SMB (중소기업융합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Innovation Technology Governance Strategies for the Future Industrial Transition Era

미래 산업전환기에 대응하는 혁신기술 거버넌스 전략

  • Seong-Hwa Jeong (Department of Game Design, Kongju National University) ;
  • Seuc-Ho Ryu (Department of Game Design, Kongju National University)
  • 정성화 (공주대학교 게임디자인학과) ;
  • 유석호 (공주대학교 게임디자인학과)
  • Received : 2026.03.06
  • Accepted : 2026.03.25
  • Published : 2026.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The advancement of convergent technologies-such as artificial intelligence, ultra-high-speed networks, and distributed energy systems-is reshaping national technological sovereignty and industrial competitiveness. As technology becomes a strategic asset, states must establish governance frameworks that ensure long-term strategic autonomy and sustainability. This study proposes an integrated, dual-functional governance model linking central strategic planning with regional innovation ecosystems. Comparative analysis indicates that expertise-based and institutionally autonomous coordination mechanisms are essential for balancing innovation and public accountability during technological transitions

21세기 중반의 기술 전환기에 인공지능, 초고속 통신망, 분산형 에너지 등 융합기술의 발전은 국가 기술 주권과 산업 경쟁력의 구조적 재편을 가속화하고 있다. 기술이 전략적 자산으로 기능함에 따라, 각 국은 장기적 전략 자율성과 지속가능성을 확보할 수 있는 제도적 거버넌스 체계의 정립이라는 과제에 직면해 있다. 본 연구는 이러한 환경 변화에 대응하기 위한 통합적 전략 조정 체계의 필요성을 이론적·제도적 틀에서 분석한다. 중앙의 중장기 전략 기획 기능과 지역 혁신 생태계의 실행 역량을 연계하는 이중기능형 거버넌스 모델을 제시하고, 비교 사례 분석을 통해 정책 일관성, 투자 효율성, 윤리·안전 규범 설계 측면에서의 제도적 함의를 검토한다. 분석 결과, 기술 패러다임 전환기에는 전문성과 제도적 자율성을 기반으로 한 전략 조정 메커니즘이 혁신 촉진과 공공적 책임 간 균형을 확보하는 핵심 조건임을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Edler, J., & Fagerberg, J. (2017). Innovation Policy: What, Why, and How. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(1), 2-23. DOI : 10.1093/oxrep/grx001
  2. Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized Interdependence: How Global Economic Networks Shape State Coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42-79. DOI : 10.1162/isec_a_00351
  3. Dyson, K., & Marcussen, M. (2010). Central Banks in the Age of the Euro: Europeanization, Convergence, and Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. DOI : 10.1093/icc/dty034
  5. OECD (2017). The Next Production Revolution: Implications for Governments and Business. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI : 10.1787/9789264271036-en
  6. Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (1999). Sources of Industrial Leadership: Studies of Seven Industries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Hall, B. H., & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  8. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
  9. Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an Integrative Framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249. DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
  10. Kattel, J., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787-801. DOI : 10.1093/icc/dty032
  11. Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014). Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 417-433. DOI : 10.1111/jpim.12105
  12. Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494-1504. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
  13. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. DOI : 10.1177/0149206316678451
  14. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803-815. DOI : 10.1093/icc/dty034
  15. Kattel, J., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy and Dynamic Capabilities in the Public Sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787-801. DOI : 10.1093/icc/dty032
  16. Freeman, C. (1987). Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan. London: Pinter Publishers.
  17. Lundvall, B. Å. (1992). National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
  18. Gawer, A. (2014). Bridging Differing Perspectives on Technological Platforms: Toward an Integrative Framework. Research Policy, 43(7), 1239-1249. DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
  19. Parker, G. G., & Van Alstyne, M. W. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design. Management Science, 51(10), 1494-1504. DOI : 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
  20. Adner, R. (2017). Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy. Journal of Management, 43(1), 39-58. DOI : 10.1177/0149206316678451
  21. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2016). Impacts of Innovation Policy: Synthesis and Conclusions. Science and Public Policy, 43(1), 2-21. DOI : 10.1093/scipol/scv076
  22. Min, J. W. (2014). An Analysis of Success Factors in Technology Transfer and Commercialization of Public Research Institutes. Doctoral dissertation, Korea University, Seoul.
  23. Markham, S. K. (2002). Moving Technologies from Lab to Market. Research-Technology Management, 45(6), 31-42. DOI : 10.1080/08956308.2002.11671531
  24. Auerswald, J., & Branscomb, L. (2003). Valleys of Death and Darwinian Seas: Financing the Invention to Innovation Transition in the United States. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3-4), 227-239. DOI : 10.1023/A:1024980525678
  25. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152. DOI : 10.2307/2393553
  26. Rothaermel, R., & Thursby, S. (2005). University-Incubator Firm Knowledge Flows: Assessing Their Impact on Incubator Firm Performance. Research Policy, 34(3), 305-320. DOI : 10.1016/j.respol.2004.11.006
  27. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and 'Mode 2' to a Triple Helix of University– Industry–Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. DOI : 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4