• STI Policy Review
• /
• 제3권1호
• /
• pp.139-161
• /
• 2012

The United States National Innovation system has many distinctive aspects and its government research institutes (GRI's) play a variety of important roles within the overall system. This paper reviews issues pertaining to U.S. GRI's but within the broader concept of US science and technology policy. After presenting an overview of the GRI's in this broader context, the paper presents a brief historical analysis of changes in the roles and deployment of U.S. GRI's. After identifying unique features of GRI's (ones that separate the U.S. GRI's from other nations) the paper concludes by identifying the ways in which the U.S. experience may be relevant to other nations such as Korea. The lessons include the competition-cooperation with large-scale and multidisciplinary university research centers, the use of GRI's to promote sharing and efficiencies in fundamental scientific equipment and resources, and the ability of GRI's to accelerate the development of science and technology.

• 지식경영연구
• /
• 제23권3호
• /
• pp.153-171
• /
• 2022

세계적으로 ESG경영 열풍이 불면서 국내,외 기업들은 자발적으로 지속가능경영을 선언하고 전략을 수립하여 적극적으로 대응하고 있다. 금융위원회에서는 ESG경영을 나타내는 지속가능보고서 공시를 단계적으로 의무화하고 있으며, 앞으로 중소기업까지 확대될 것이다. 지속가능보고서의 정보공개는 주로 국제표준 GRI, SASB, TCFD로 활용되며, 국내 다수 기업이 GRI Standards 가이드라인을 사용하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 지속가능보고서의 구성체계를 살펴보고 GRI Standards를 기준으로 공기업과 사기업을 비교하여 유형별 지속가능경영을 분석하고자 한다. TF-IDF 모델링을 통해 분석 결과 공기업은 '사회', '노동' 분야에 초점을 두었으며, 사기업은 '경제', '환경' 분야에 집중하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 전자·정보통신 산업은 '제품책임'에 중점을 두는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과는 지속가능경영을 등급에 따라 수치화하여 분석한 기존 연구와는 달리 비정형데이터인 지속가능보고서를 분석함으로써 ESG경영에 관심을 갖는 연구자 및 관리자에게 유용한 이론적, 실무적 시사점을 제공할 것으로 기대된다.

• 기술혁신연구
• /
• 제13권1호
• /
• pp.265-293
• /
• 2005

This research examines the relationship between the characteristics of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI) and their institutional performance evaluation system. First, based on Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model, six perspectives suitable to Korean GRI are derived. Second, personnel who works on evaluation job classified current performance measures into the six perspectives. Analyzing comparative weights of individual perspectives, the characteristics of performance evaluation systems among institutes are derived and compared with their missions. The results are as follows: First, GRI evaluation systems put most weight on the customer perspective and least weight on the financial perspective. This result complies with Korean GRI's missions and strategies as well as findings of foreign cases. Second, Basic-technology GRI group relatively more priotizes long-term customer perspective, while Applied-technology GRI Group relatively more priotizes short-term customer perspective. Public-technology GRI Group is located in the middle in terms of priority of customer perspectives. Third, for three yews (2000-2002), performance measure weights of Basic-technology Group are changed much less than those of the other two groups. Further research are needed for reasons of drastic changes for Applied-technology and Public-technology groups and some abnormally high and low measure weights.

• 대한산업공학회지
• /
• 제43권3호
• /
• pp.154-163
• /
• 2017

Research collaboration is regarded as core source to lead various innovations in all countries. This paper compares and analyzes the performance of Industry-University-Government Research Institutes (GRI) collaboration based on the four types of research collaborations; GRI-GRI, Industry-GRI, University-GRI and Industry-University-GRI. So this paper will show which collaboration type has the best work on each R&D step. We use four R&D steps; research, development, commercialization and overall. We also evaluate the performance of research collaboration of GRIs based on the collaboration types. In order to evaluate the performance of research collaboration, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is employed for measuring the efficiency of GRIs in this paper. DEA is a non-parametric approach to measuring the relative efficiency of decision-making units (DMUs) with multiple inputs and outputs. The empirical results represent that the performance of collaboration with industry is generally superior to other collaboration types. These findings from this paper are expected to provide basic information for national collaboration strategy making.

• 산업경영시스템학회지
• /
• 제45권1호
• /
• pp.53-70
• /
• 2022

Recently, due to the change to SASB(Sustainability Accounting Standards Board) and GRI(Global Reporting Initiative) Standards 2021, the paradigm for non-financial information disclosure is changing significantly, with the number of ESG topics and indicators that must be disclosed by industry from an autonomous material topic selection method. This study revealed that the number of compulsory topics in the oil and gas industry by GRI standards 2021 is up to 2.4 times higher than the average number of material topics disclosed when domestic companies publish sustainability reports using GRI Standards 2020. In the oil and gas industry, I analyzed the similarities and differences between the GRI standards 2021 and the ESG topics covered by SASB by environmental, social, economic, and governance areas. In addition, the materiality test process, which is different in GRI standards 2021, is introduced, and the issues included in the following 10 representative ESG-related initiatives are summarized into 62 and suggested improvement plans for materiality test used in the topic pool.

• 대한안전경영과학회지
• /
• 제11권4호
• /
• pp.1-6
• /
• 2009

This study was evaluated the indicators of GRI guideline LA6-LA9 for industrial safety sanitation field on 22 domestic sustainable management reports and 46 overseas reports published by companies in 2007 and 2008, was developed new indicators with emphasis on industrial safety sanitation act, and was assessed whether they are released. As a result, LA6(Percent of total workforce represented in formal joint management-work health and safety committees that help monitor and advise on occupational health and safety programs) was evaluated highest in release ratio on whether to release the reports by each indicator of industrial safety sanitation field using domestic sustainable management report GRI guideline, and in the case of overseas companies, it was evaluated that there is no companies that release all from LA6 through LA9 among GRI guideline, but it was grasped that the ratio of partial release is high. As for the release of indicators was developed with the use of industrial safety sanitation act of 22 domestic companies, the release of indicator No. 1(report and industrial disaster record) and 10(health diagnosis) of industrial safety sanitation act was high. This study is meaningful in that it analyzed the industrial safety sanitation field of sustainable management report(CSR) that has not been attempted so far with the use of new indicators developed with emphasis on GRI guideline and industrial safety sanitation act.

• 기술혁신학회지
• /
• 제8권3호
• /
• pp.1087-1116
• /
• 2005

This research examines performance evaluatees' opinions regarding the institutional performance evaluation systems of Government S&T Research Institutes (GRI). Research methodology is as follows: first, four perspectives of Kaplan & Norton (1992) Balanced Scorecard Model are revised into six perspectives suitable to GRI's characteristics. Second, experts classify current performance evaluation measures into the six perspectives. This enables different evaluation systems of three GRI evaluation groups to be compared under the same evaluation measures. Third, GRI's evaluatees are asked to allocate ideal weights on the performance measures. The evaluatees' weights are compared with the weights of current performance measures, and the characteristics of evaluatees' opinions about current performance evaluation systems are analyzed. Results are as follows; first, six perspectives for Korean GRIs are financial, long-term outcome, short-term outcome, strategic direction, project management, human resources perspectives. second, GRI evaluation systems put the most weights on the long- and short-term outcome perspectives and the least weights on the financial perspective. This result complies with theoretical model: in performance evaluation of GRIs, the customer perspective is the most important one while the financial perspective is the least important one. Third, evaluatees think that the long-term outcome perspective of the Basic-technology GRI group and the short-term outcome perspective of the Applied-technology GRI Group needs more weight. Fourth, it is found that the current systems have more weights on the project management and strategic direction perspectives than evaluatees think. The possible explanation of this result would be that since the measures of these perspectives are relatively easier to set up than those of other perspectives, the current systems contains larger number of measures and, accordingly more weights.

• 한국환경과학회지
• /
• 제27권8호
• /
• pp.701-709
• /
• 2018

Few prior studies investigated the correlation between corporate ownership structure and environmental information disclosure. Using environmental index disclosure in GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) reports of the Korean companies, the study examines the effects of ownership structure on the magnitude of environmental information disclosure. A total of 220 firm-years during 2013-2016 period are analyzed. The empirical results of the study indicate that the institutional and foreign investors' ownership have positive correlations with environmental information disclosure, while the executives' within board of directors has a negative correlation. The ownership by largest shareholders including those with special interests shows no significant relationship with the environmental information disclosure.

• 디지털융복합연구
• /
• 제11권9호
• /
• pp.29-43
• /
• 2013

출연연 제도변화에 대한 지배적인 관점은 환경 정책변화라는 외부적인 환경의 요구사항에 기능적으로 대응하기 위해 변화한다는 기능론적 입장이다. 하지만 출연연 제도는 내부적 요인으로 인해 변화가 발생하기도 한다. 따라서 출연연 제도변화를 분석에 있어서 외부적 요인과 내부적 요인이 상호작용해서 변화가 발생한다는 동태적인 대안적 모형이 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 출연연 예산제도가 연구과제중심제도(PBS 모델)에서 묶음예산 모델로 변화하는 과정을 살펴보았는데, 변화과정이 동태적 제도변화 양식 중에 층화(layering)에 해당함을 확인하였다. 즉 외부적 요인과 내부적 요인이 상호작용해서 PBS 모델을 수정하기 위해 정부출연금 확대라는 제도개선의 층을 지속적으로 누적시켰다. 결국 안정적 연구환경 조성 및 연구전념을 위해 지속적으로 누적된 정부출연금 확대라는 제도개선의 층은 정치적 계기를 맞아 단계적으로 빠르게 성장함으로서 묶음예산 모델로 변화되는 동태적인 과정을 확인하였다.

• 한국의상디자인학회지
• /
• 제25권2호
• /
• pp.45-59
• /
• 2023

This study aims to find implications for the introduction and practice of ESG by domestic fashion companies by examining the core ESG topics and strategies of Samsung C&T Fashion Division, Kolon FnC, F&F holdings, and Fila. ESG management analysis examined the importance of the criticality evaluation process, critical issues, and implementation strategies for each key topic based on the company's 2021 ESG sustainable management report, and analyzed the relationship with UN SDGs and the GRI. The analysis results are as follows: As for KCGS' ESG rating, Samsung C&T's fashion division, Kolon FnC, and Fila Holdings were rated A, while F&F Holdings was rated B+. The major issues derived from ESG's criticality assessment are environmental issues related to Samsung C&T's fashion division. Kolon FnC was found to have focused on the social sector and F&F Holdings focused on governance structure. After examining the correlation between the ESG core strategies of the investigated fashion companies and the 17 SDGs, the common areas were identified as quality employment, sustainable production and consumption, and climate changes and response. Correlation with the GRI Standards 2021 Index, (GRI 1, GRI 11, and GRI 12 created in 2021) was not reflected. In the future, it will be necessary to have a transparent governance structure that meets global standards, sets measurable goals, and continuously manages them. Other companies should also recognize ESG management processes that embrace various stakeholders and strengthens win-win cooperation to manage risks, and establish mid- to long-term response strategies.