• Title/Summary/Keyword: soilbag

Search Result 5, Processing Time 0.023 seconds

A Study of Connection Stability for Reinforced Retaining Wall Constructed with Soilbag with Varying Connection Strength (연결강도 변화에 의한 Soilbag 보강토 옹벽 연결부의 안정성 평가)

  • Lee, Sang-Moon;Choi, Changho;Shin, Eun-Chul
    • Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.1
    • /
    • pp.101-107
    • /
    • 2013
  • Environmental-friendly and economical construction are the recent issues for civil structures and soilbag as facing wall is widely used for cut-slope remediation projects. However, the stability of structures is an important issue for the use of environmental-friendly and economical materials. In order to understand the stability of soilbag reinforced retaining wall, tensile resistance, rupture, tensile strength, and internal/external safety factor of the wall were analyzed with MSEW program and the results were compared to the safety factor of block-type reinforced walls. The stability of retaining wall was analyzed with reduction coefficients of connection strength to check the connection stability. Because it is possible to move between soilbag and geogrid connector for soilbag retaining wall, the safety factor of the wall was analyzed with different inclination angles of soilbag. The analysis result shows that the connection strength and internal/external stability of soilbag reinforced wall satisfy the stability criteria.

Assessment of Geosynthetic Soilbag Method to Restore the Roadbed of Railway (철도노반 복구를 위한 토목섬유 Soilbag 공법의 적용성 평가)

  • Hwang, Seon-Keun;Koh, Tae-Hoon;Park, Sung-Hyun
    • Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation
    • /
    • v.4 no.1 s.12
    • /
    • pp.65-75
    • /
    • 2004
  • Roadbed failure due to the natural disaster may bring out social and economic damage such as the loss of life and property, the consumption of time and cost for recovery, and the delay of logistics in railway In this study, the method using geosynthetic soilbag was applied to rehabilitation of the railway roadbed which was failed by disaster. The full scale tests with the simulated train loading were performed in order to evaluate the static and dynamic performance at the railway roadbed using geosynthetic soilbag. The results of these tests were compared with unreinforced and reinforced cases with geosynthetic soilbag, respectively The data gathered by various measurement devices from these full scale tests would be useful to evaluate and understand the roadbed with geosynthetic soilbag. In conclusion, geosynthetic soilbag was evaluated as a permanent restoration method to reinforce the roadbed of railway.

A large-scale test of reinforced soil railway embankment with soilbag facing under dynamic loading

  • Liu, Huabei;Yang, Guangqing;Wang, He;Xiong, Baolin
    • Geomechanics and Engineering
    • /
    • v.12 no.4
    • /
    • pp.579-593
    • /
    • 2017
  • Geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls can be employed as railway embankments to carry large static and dynamic train loads, but very few studies can be found in the literature that investigate their dynamic behavior under simulated wheel loading. A large-scale dynamic test on a reinforced soil railway embankment was therefore carried out. The model embankment was 1.65 meter high and designed to have a soilbag facing. It was reinforced with HDPE geogrid layers at a vertical spacing of 0.3 m and a length of 2 m. The dynamic test consisted of 1.2 million cycles of harmonic dynamic loading with three different load levels and four different exciting frequencies. Before the dynamic loading test, a static test was also carried out to understand the general behavior of the embankment behavior. The study indicated the importance of loading frequency on the dynamic response of reinforced soil railway embankment. It also showed that toe resistance played a significant role in the dynamic behavior of the embankment. Some limitations of the test were also discussed.

Evaluation of PBD as Horizontal Drains of Soilbag Retaining Wall (토낭 보강토 옹벽의 수평 배수재로서 PBD의 적용성 평가)

  • Shin, Eun-Chul;Lee, Myung-Shin;Kim, Sung-Hwan
    • Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
    • /
    • v.12 no.2
    • /
    • pp.35-42
    • /
    • 2013
  • Recently, construction of reinforced earth structure using geosynthetics has been increased because it has advantages such as construction efficient, cost effectiveness and appearance aspect against existing gravity or cantilever retaining wall. However due to the climate change in Korea excessive inflow of ground water and surface water from heavy rainfall could affect the stability of reinforced retaining wall seriously. So the discharge capacity of drains should be evaluated by using experimental method in the design of reinforced earth wall. In this study, instead of concrete block used in most of the retaining wall, eco-friendly porous soilbag was used. This paper describes the test method and result of the laboratory testing for determination of discharge capacity utilizing PBDs.

Design and Construction of Cellular Foundation Mattress as Foundations of Building Structures (건축구조물 기초로서 셀룰러 기초 매트리스의 설계 및 시공)

  • Jeong Young Lee;Jong Gon Ko;Nguyen Ngoc Son;Jae Hak Park;Doo Kie Kim
    • Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society
    • /
    • v.22 no.1
    • /
    • pp.25-37
    • /
    • 2023
  • Cellular Foundation Mattress made of new materials such as high density polyethylene, are not currently use for the foundation of small and medium-sized buildings in Korea. Therefore, they need to be developed and verified based on domestic ground and field conditions. This study presents the basic design and construction method of Cellular Foundation Mattress. Since the foundation reinforcement effect of Cellular Foundation Mattress should be evaluated and verified for soft ground, a performance comparison evaluation was conducted using the Soilbag method, which is commonly used for the foundation of small and medium-sized buildings in Korea. After the mattress reinforcement, the settlement amount decreased by 38.4% compared to the original ground and the bearing capacity increased by 159%, confirming the same ground reinforcement effect and ground stability as the Soilbag method.