A Comparative Study on the Local Governments' Environmental Impact Assessment Systems between Korea and Japan I - forcusing on target projects and assessment items -

한국과 일본의 지방자치단체 환경영향평가 제도 비교 연구 I - 대상사업 및 평가항목을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2003.11.13
  • Accepted : 2004.03.13
  • Published : 2004.04.30

Abstract

This study aims to review the environmental impact assessment systems of Japanese local governments, to compare its outcome with the systems of Korean local governments, and to suggest the development direction for the environmental impact assessment systems of Korean local governments based on the result. The study results showed that, first, due to distinction in the political systems of Japan and Korea, while Japan has bottom-up environmental impact assessment systems, Korea has topdown environment impact assessment systems. Second, although introduction of national systems on planning was put on hold as a future initiative, local governments including Tokyo and Saitama are experimenting evaluation procedures tailored to local features by legislating them as regulations. On the other hand, while 'prior environmental review system' was in effect as a national system, nothing was practiced at all by local governments. Third, in a total of 47 Japanese local governments, about 45 projects and 44 assessment items were added to local government environmental impact assessment only and designated as target projects and assessment items. Fourth, in both national and local environment impact assessment systems in Japan, screening procedures to determine assessment by separating into Type 1 projects and Type 2 projects and scoping procedures to discuss assessment items in advance were introduced and in effect. This Japanese EIA system may serve as a good reference to the Korean national and local government EIA systems.

Keywords

References

  1. 남영숙, 1995, 지속가능한 지역사회 건설을 위한지방자치단체 환경성 평가에 관한 연구, 환경리포트 14
  2. 남영숙, 1996, 지자제 실시에 따른 환경영향평가제도의 내실화를 위한 연구, 한국환경기술개발원, 12
  3. 성현찬 등, 1993, 환경영향평가서의 내실화를 위한 연구, 환경처
  4. 성현찬·민수현, 2003, 지방자치단체 환경영향평가 조례 비교 연구, 한국환경영향평가학회지 12(3): 137-150
  5. 조진상, 1995, 독일지방자치단체의 환경영향평가 경험
  6. 岡山縣, 1999, 岡山縣環境影響評價等に關する條例 (條例7)
  7. 京都市, 1998, 京都市環境影響評價等に關する條例(條例44)
  8. 廣島市, 1999, 廣島市環境影響評價條例(條例30)
  9. 群馬縣, 1999, 群馬縣環境影響評價條例(條例19)
  10. 埼玉縣, 2002, 埼玉縣戰略的環境影響評價實施要 綱.(http://www.pref.saitama.jp/A09/BB00/a sesu/ saitamaSEA/index.html)
  11. 大分縣, 1999, 大分縣環境影響評價條例(條例11)
  12. 大阪府, 1998, 大阪府環境影響評價條例(條例3)
  13. 東京都環境局, 2003, 計劃段階環境影響評價(計劃アセス)手續について. 1.
  14. 東京都, 2002, 東京都環境影響評價條例(條例127)
  15. 名古屋市, 1998, 名古屋市環境影響評價條例(條例 40)
  16. 福岡市, 1996, 福岡市環境基本條例(條例 41)
  17. 福岡縣, 1998, 福岡縣環境影響評價條例(條例 39)
  18. 富山縣, 1999, 富山縣環境影響評價條例(條例 38)
  19. 三重縣, 2002, 三重縣環境調整システム推進要綱
  20. 仙台市, 1998, 仙台市環境影響評價條例(條例44)
  21. 神戶市, 1997, 神戶市 環境影響評價等に關する條 70 例(條例29)
  22. 岩手縣, 1998, 岩手縣環境影響評價條例(條例42)
  23. 戰略的環境アセスメント硏究會, 2001, わかりや すい戰略的環境アセスメント,「戰略的環 境アセスメント綜合硏究會報告書」, 中央法規出版. 37
  24. 戰略的環境アセスメント綜合硏究會, 1999, 戰略 的環境アセスメントに關する國內外の取組 と我が國における今後の展望について, 「戰 略的環境アセスメント綜合硏究會中間報告書」, 1-2, .11-27.(http://assess.eic.or.jp/houkokusho/sea9907/)
  25. 佐賀縣, 1999, 佐賀縣環境影響評價條例(條例25)
  26. 川崎市, 1991, 川崎市環境基本條例(條例28)
  27. 千葉市, 1998, 千葉市 環境影響評價條例(條例 39)
  28. 香川縣, 1999, 香川縣環境影響評價條例(條例 2)
  29. 環境省, 1996, 環境影響評價制度の現狀と課題について, 環境影響評價制度綜合硏究會報告書, 5-6, 22
  30. 環境省, 1997, 環境影響評價 技術指針等に關する 基本的事項, 457
  31. 環境省, 2003, 環境影響評價情報支援ネットワ-ク, 環境影響評價法について(http://assess.eic.or.jp)
  32. 環境省, 2003, 環境影響評價制度 관련 자료 4-④