Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment (환경영향평가)

Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment (한국환경영향평가학회)
권호 표지

Application of contingent valuation method for estimating willingness-to-pay in planning the integrated sewerage system in the catchment of Dam Chung-Ju

충주댐 상류지역 하수도시설 확충사업에 관한 주민의 지불의사액 추정을 위한 CVM의 적용에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2004.03.09
  • Accepted : 2004.04.13
  • Published : 2004.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this research was to estimate residents' willingness-to-pay using contingent valuation method and to investigate their environmental sensibilities prior to conduct the costbenefit analysis on the watershed management program of integrated sewerage construction and operation in the catchment of Dam Chung-Ju. A set of questionnaire was prepared and asked to 1,200 residents at downstream area as well as upstream area of Dam Chung-Ju. As a result, environmental sensibility of the residents living in the catchment of upstream of Lake Chung-Ju seemed very high. However, the substantial practice in their own life for conserving their environment was inactive, although residents' efforts trying to collect and dispose garbages in separate containers and to minimize the waste discharge load were actually made. The willingness-to-pay on each month for 20 years was estimated as 4,841 wons for the openended question and 3,411 wons for the close-ended question. Factorial analysis was also performed to obtain correlation among the questions asked. Seven groups of the correlated questions were identified and their contribution to the estimated willingness-to-pay was analyzed.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽승준, 유승훈, 김찬준, 2002, 농촌폐비닐의 재활용확대정책에 대한 경제적 편익측정, 한국재정·공공경제학회 정책논총, 17(1), 23-45
  2. 김광임, 민동기, 정회성, 염현정, 김미숙, 1999, 수질오염의 사회적 비용 계량화 연구 : 한강수계를 중심으로, 한국환경정책·평가연구원
  3. 김종대, 이동수, 조문기, 2002, 조건부가치측정법 (CVM)에 의한 지불의사액(WTP)의 추정, 충북대학교 산업과 경영, 15(1), 173-191
  4. 신영철, 1997, 이중양분선택형 질문 CVM을 이용한 한강 수질개선 편익 측정, 환경경제연구, 6(1), 171-192
  5. 엄영숙, 2001, 만경강 수질개선 편익측정을 위한 조건부가치평가에 있어서 범위효과 분석, 자원·환경경제연구, 10(3), 387-412
  6. 유승훈, 김태유, 1999, 조건부가치측정법을 이용한 서울시 오존오염 저감정책의 편익분석, 한국정책학회보, 8(3), 191-211
  7. 장태구, 1997, 임의가치법(CVM)을 이용한 환경재의 가치평가 : 낙동강의 편익 산출을 중심으로, 한국지역개발학회지, 9(1), 55-69
  8. 홍성표, 김정흠, 1996, 조건부가치측정법에 의한 대기환경의 경제적 가치평가, 충남대학교 경영경제연구소 경제논총, 12, 65-75
  9. 황영순, 엄미정, 김태유, 1999, 수돗물 공급신뢰도 개선의 가치측정, 환경경제연구, 8(1), 109-126
  10. Brauer, I., 2003, Money as an indicator: to make use of economic evaluation for biodiversity conservation, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 98, 483-491 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(03)00107-5
  11. Christie, M., 2001, A comparison of alternative contingent valuation elicitation treatments for the evaluation of complex environmental policy, Journal of Environmental Management, 62, 255-269 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0439
  12. Damigos, D. and Kaliampakos, D., 2003, Assessing the benefits of reclaiming urban quarries: a CVM analysis, Landscape and Urban Planning, 64, 249-258 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00243-8
  13. Kawabe, M. and Oka, T., 1996, Benefit fromimprovement of organic contamination ofTokyo bay, Marine Pollution Bulletin, 32(11),788-793 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(96)00035-5
  14. Koss, P. and Khawaja, M.S., 2001, The value of water supply reliability in California: a contingent valuation study, Water Policy, 3, 165-174 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1366-7017(01)00005-8
  15. Margai, F.L., 1995, Evaluating the potential for environmental quality improvement in a community distressed by manmade hazards, Journal of Environmental Management, 44, 181-190 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1995.0038
  16. Piper, S. and Martin, W.E., 2001, Evaluating the ccuracy of the benefit transfer method: A rural water supply application in the USA, Journal of Environmental Management, 63, 223-235 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.2001.0464
  17. Roomratanapun, W., 2001, Introducing centralised wastewater treatment in Bangkok: a study of factors determining its acceptability, Habit International, 25, 359-371 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0197-3975(00)00041-2
  18. Stenger, A. and Willinger, M., 1998, Preservation value for groundwater quality in a large aquifer: a contingent-valuation study of the Alsatian aquifer, Journal of Environmental Management, 53, 177-193 https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1998.0197
  19. Turpie, J.K., 2003, The existence value of biodiversity in South Africa: how interest, experience, knowledge, income and perceived level of treat influence local willingness to pay, Ecological Economics, 46, 199~216 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00122-8
  20. Willis, K.G. and Garrod, G.D., 1998, Watercompanies and river environments: the external costs of water abstraction, Utilities Policy, 7, 35-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-1787(97)00028-3