The Korean Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology

The Korean Society of Pharmacology (대한약리학회)
권호 표지

Accurate Representation of Light-intensity Information by the Neural Activities of Independently Firing Retinal Ganglion Cells

  • Ryu, Sang-Baek (Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Ye, Jang-Hee (Department of Physiology, Chungbuk National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Chi-Hyun (Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Health Science, Yonsei University) ;
  • Goo, Yong-Sook (Department of Physiology, Chungbuk National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Kyung-Hwan (Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Health Science, Yonsei University)
  • Published : 2009.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For successful restoration of visual function by a visual neural prosthesis such as retinal implant, electrical stimulation should evoke neural responses so that the informat.ion on visual input is properly represented. A stimulation strategy, which means a method for generating stimulation waveforms based on visual input, should be developed for this purpose. We proposed to use the decoding of visual input from retinal ganglion cell (RGC) responses for the evaluation of stimulus encoding strategy. This is based on the assumption that reliable encoding of visual information in RGC responses is required to enable successful visual perception. The main purpose of this study was to determine the influence of inter-dependence among stimulated RGCs activities on decoding accuracy. Light intensity variations were decoded from multiunit RGC spike trains using an optimal linear filter. More accurate decoding was possible when different types of RGCs were used together as input. Decoding accuracy was enhanced with independently firing RGCs compared to synchronously firing RGCs. This implies that stimulation of independently-firing RGCs and RGCs of different types may be beneficial for visual function restoration by retinal prosthesis.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown EN, Kass RE, Mitra PP. Multiple neural spike train data analysis: state-of-the-art and future challenges. Nat Neurosci 7: 456−461, 2004 https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1228
  2. Brown SP, He S, Masland RH. Receptive field microstructure and dendritic geometry of retinal ganglion cells. Neuron 27: 371−383, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00044-1
  3. Cho HS, Jin GH, Goo YS. Characterization of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with multichannel recording. Korean J Med Phys 15: 228−236, 2004
  4. Field GD, Chichilnisky EJ. Information processing in the primate retina: circuitry and coding. Annu Rev Neurosci 30: 1−30, 2007 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094252
  5. Fried SI, Hsueh HA, Werblin FS. A method for generating precise temporal patterns of retinal spiking using prosthetic stimulation. J Neurophysiol 95: 970−978, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00849.2005
  6. Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Fujii GY, Greenberg R, Williamson R, Little J, Mech B, Cimmarusti V, Boemel GV, Dagnelie G, de Juan E. Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis. Vision Res 43: 2573−2581, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00457-7
  7. Kim KH, Kim SS, Kim SJ. Superiority of nonlinear mapping in decoding multiple single-unit neuronal spike trains: a simulation study. J Neurosci Methods 150: 202−211, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.06.015
  8. Majji AB, Humayun MS, Weiland JD, Suzuki S, D'Anna SA, de Juan E. Long-term histological and electrophysiological results of an inactive epiretinal electrode array implantation in dogs. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 40: 2073−2081, 1999
  9. Meister M, Lagnado L, Baylor DA. Concerted signaling by retinal ganglion cells. Science 270: 1207−1210, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.270.5239.1207
  10. Merabet LB, Rizzo JF, Amedi A, Somers DC, Pascual-Leone A. What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprosthesis. Nat Rev Neurosci 6: 71−77, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1586
  11. Nicolelis MAL. Methods for Neural Ensemble recording. CRC Press, Florida, 1998
  12. Rizzo JF, Wyatt J, Loewenstein J, Kelly S, Shire D. Methods and perceptual thresholds for short-term electrical stimulation of human retina with microelectrode arrays. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 44: 5355−5361, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.02-0819
  13. Ryu SB, Kim DH, Ye JH, Kim KH, Goo YS. Estimation of visual stimulus intensity from retinal ganglion cell spike trains using optimal linear filter. J Biomed Eng Res 28: 212−217, 2007
  14. Santos A, Humayun MS, de Juan E, Greenburg RJ, Marsh MJ, Klock IB, Milam AM. Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa: a morphometric analysis. Arch Ophthal 115: 511−515, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150513011
  15. Sekirnjak C, Hottowy P, Sher A, Dabrowski W, Litke AM, Chichilnisky EJ. Electrical stimulation of mammalian retinal ganglion cells with multielectrode array. J Neurophysiol 95: 3311−3327, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.01168.2005
  16. Stett A, Barth W, Weiss S, Haemmerle H, Zrenner E. Electrical multisite stimulation of the isolated chicken retina. Vision Res 40: 1785−1795, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0042-6989(00)00005-5
  17. Warland DK, Reinagel P, Meister M. Decoding visual information from a population of retinal ganglion cells. J Neurophysiol 78: 2336−2350, 1997
  18. Wessberg J, Stambaugh CR, Kralik JD, Beck PD, Laubach M, Chapin JK, Kim J, Biggs SJ, Srinivasan MA, Nicolelis MA. Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature 408: 361−365, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1038/35042582
  19. Ye JH, Ryu SB, Kim KH, Goo YS. Functional connectivity map of retinal ganglion cells for retinal prosthesis. Korean J Physiol Pharmacol 12: 307−314, 2008 https://doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2008.12.6.307
  20. Zrenner E. Will retinal implants restore vision? Science 295: 1022−1025, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1067996