Journal of Wetlands Research (한국습지학회지)

Korean Wetlands Society (한국습지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Two-Dimensional Model for Inundation Analysis in Flood Plain Area

홍수시 둔치구간의 수리해석을 위한 2차원 모형 비교

  • Ku, Young Hun (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering (NRERC), Inje University) ;
  • Kim, Young Do (Department of Environmental Science and Engineering (NRERC), Inje University)
  • 구영훈 (인제대학교 환경공학과(낙동강유역환경연구센터)) ;
  • 김영도 (인제대학교 환경공학과(낙동강유역환경연구센터))
  • Received : 2013.04.23
  • Accepted : 2013.06.07
  • Published : 2014.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the flood plain, river facilities such as sports facilities and ecological park are builded up since the late 2000s. The recent increase of rainfall intensity and flood frequency results in the immersions of parks and river facilities located in the flood plain. Therefore it is necessary to perform the numerical analysis for the extreme rain storm in the flood plain. In this study, to analyze the hydraulic impact by lowering and rising of the water level at flood plain, Both the FaSTMECH, which is a quasi-unsteady flow analysis model to be used for simulating the wet and dry, and the Nays2D, which is unsteady flow analysis model, are used in this study. Also, the flow velocity distribution and the inundation are compared over a period of the typhoon. As a result, the flow velocity distribution at flood plain showed very low values compared to the flow rate in the main channel. This means that the problem of sedimentation is more important than that of erosion in the flood plain.

2000년대 후반 이래로 홍수터를 활용한 생태공원이나 체육시설 등과 같은 다양한 친수시설들이 조성되었다. 또한 최근 강우강도 및 홍수 빈도의 증가로 인해 관련 피해가 급증하고 있으며, 이는 홍수터에 설치된 공원과 같은 친수시설들의 침수피해와 직접적으로 연관되므로, 극한강우 시 홍수터에서의 수치해석이 필요하다고 판단된다. 본 연구에서는 홍수터에서의 수위상승과 하강에 따른 수리학적 영향을 분석하기 위해 마름/젖음 모의가 가능한 준부정류 흐름해석모형인 FaSTMECH와 부정류 흐름해석모형인 Nays2D 모형을 이용하여 각 모델간의 태풍 사상시 시간에 따른 침수심 및 유속분포를 비교 분석하였다. 태풍 사상시 홍수터에서의 유속분포는 주수로에서의 유속에 비해 매우 낮은 유속을 보이고 있었으며, 홍수터에서는 침식보다는 토사퇴적 문제가 더 높을 것이라 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Adeff, SE and Wang, SSY (1985). Hydro-Dynamic Model for River Flow in a Microcomputer. Hydraulics and hydrology in small computer age, ASCE, pp. 1017-1023.
  2. Ali, OA and Ben, CY (1981). Diffusion-Wave Flood Routing in Channel Networks. J. of Hydraulics Division. ASCE. 107(HY6), pp. 719-732.
  3. Ahn, KH, Choi, GW, Jo, HG and Jo, SU (2009). Study for influence by installing structures at lower the Han. Proceedings of 2009 KWRA Spring Meeting, J. of Korea Water Resources Association, pp. 718-722.
  4. Choi, GW (1991). Hydrodynamic Network Simulation through Channel Junctions. Ph.D. Dissertation, Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO.
  5. Choi, SY, Han, KY, Kim, BH and Kim, SH (2009). Parameter Assessment for the Simulation of Drying/Wetting in Finite Element Analysis in River and Wetland. J. of Environmental Impact Assessment, 18(6), pp. 331-346.
  6. Choi, SY, Nam, KY and Han, KY (2011). Assessment for Characteristics of Flow According to Installing Hydraulic Structures by 2-D Numerical Model. J. of Environmental Impact Assessment, 20(6), pp. 797-813.
  7. Jeon, GS (1998). Quasi-Two-Dimensional Model for Floodplain Flow Simulation. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 31(5), pp. 515-528.
  8. Kim, DG, Lee, LY, Lee CW, Kang, NR, Lee, JS, Kim, HS (2011). Analysis of Flood Reduction Effect of Washland using Hydraulic Experiment. J. of Wetlands Research, 13(2), pp. 307-317.
  9. Kim, SH, Choi, SY, Oh, HW and Han, KY (2009). Development of Grid Reconstruction Method to Simulate Drying/Wetting in Natural Rivers (I): Model Development and Verification. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 42(11), pp. 973-988. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2009.42.11.973
  10. Kim, SY (2002). Analysis of flow characteristics by the Tide Influence in Singok Inline-weir. Master's degree Dissertation, Kyonggi University.
  11. Ku, YH, Song, CG, Kim, YD and Seo, IW (2013). Analysis of Hydraulic Characteristics of Flood Plain Using Two-Dimensional Unsteady Model. J. of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 33(3), pp. 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2013.33.3.997
  12. Lee, JH, Kim, KT and Shim, MP (1996). Finite Volume Method for Two-Dimensional Unsteady Flow in Open Channel. J. of Korea Water Resources Association, 29(5), pp. 173-184.
  13. MLTM (Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs). (2009). Nakdong River Basin River Master Plan Report (Change), Technical Report.
  14. Nelson, JM and McDonald, RR (1996). Mechanics and Modeling of Flow and Bed Evolution in Lateral Separation Eddies. Rep. to Grand Canyon Monitoring and Research Center.
  15. Nelson, JM, Bennett, JP and Wiele, SM (2003). Flow and Sediment Transport Modeling Tools in Fluvial Geomorphology. Wiley, England. pp. 539-576.
  16. Nelson, J, Mcdonald, RR and Kinzel, P (2006). Morphologic Evolution in the USGS Surface-Water Modeling System. J. of Federal Interagency Sedimentation Conference (8th FISC). pp. 233-240.
  17. Sato, S, Imamura, F and Shuto, N (1989). Numerical simulation of flooding and damage to houses by the Yoshida River due to Typhoon No. 8610. J. Natura Disaster Science, 11(2), pp. 1-19.
  18. Seo, IW and Song, CG (2010a). Development of 2D Finite Element Model for the Analysis of Shallow Water Flow. J. of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 30(2B), pp. 199-209.
  19. Seo, IW and Song, CG (2010b). Specification of Wall Boundary Conditions and Transverse Velocity Profile Conditions in Finite Element Modeling. J. of Hydrodynamics, 22(5), pp. 633-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-6058(10)60006-6
  20. Seo, IW and Song, CG (2012). Numerical Simulation of Laminar Flow Past a Circular Cylinder with Slip Conditions. International Journal For Numerical Methods In Fluids, 68(12), pp. 1538-1560. https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.2542
  21. Seo, Kyu-Woo (2002). A Study on the Floodplain Management Plan due to Inundation of Nakdong River Basin. J. of Wetlands Research, 4(2), pp. 57-66.
  22. Song, CG and Seo, IW (2012). Numerical Simulation of Convection-dominated Flow Using SU/PG Scheme. J. of Korean Society of Civil Engineers, 32(3B), pp. 175-183.
  23. Song, CG, Seo, IW and Kim, YD (2012). Analysis of Secondary Current Effect in the Modeling of Shallow Flow in Open Channels. Advances in Water Resources, 41, pp. 29-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.02.003
  24. Vreugdenhul, CB and Wijbenga, JHA (1982). Computation of Flow Patterns in River. J. of Hydraulics Division, ASCE 108(HY11), pp. 1296-130.
  25. Yong, CJ (2003). Comparison Analysis of River Flow Models and Sediment Transport Models. Master's degree Dissertation. Honam University.
  26. Yabe, T and Ishikawa, T (1990). A numeri-cal cubicinterpolated pseudoparticle (CIP) method without time splitting technique for hyperbolic equation. Jour. of PSJ, 59(7), pp. 2301-2304.

Cited by

  1. Comparative Analysis of Inundation Mapping Approaches for the 2016 Flood in the Brazos River, Texas vol.54, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12623