DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Changes of Dynamic Stereoacuity Depending on Distance between Rods and Rod Thickness in Three Rods Test

세막대 검사에서 막대 간 거리와 막대두께 차이에 의한 동적입체시력의 변화

  • 한경도 (강원대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 이민재 (강원대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 김상엽 (강원대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 문병연 (강원대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 유동식 (강원대학교 안경광학과) ;
  • 조현국 (강원대학교 안경광학과)
  • Received : 2016.07.29
  • Accepted : 2016.08.26
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether the distance between objects and the size of object are factors to be able to affect dynamic stereoacuity. Methods: Subjects were 37 adults (26 males and 11 females) with an average age of $23.89{\pm}1.76$. Refractive error was fully corrected for all subjects and each visual acuity of them was over 0.9. Three rods test was performed for measurement of stereoacuity. The viewing angles from left rod to right rod were set $5^{\circ}$, $10^{\circ}$, and $15^{\circ}$ and the rod thickness used 7 mm, 14 mm, and 21 mm, respectively. Stereoacuity was repeatedly measured three times in each test condition at 2.5 m distance, and reported the average value of them. Results: When rod thickness was 7 mm or 14 mm, dynamic stereoacuity decreased as the viewing angle increased, and they were significantly decreased (p<0.01) at viewing angles of $10^{\circ}$ and $15^{\circ}$ as compared with that of at $5^{\circ}$, respectively. When rod thickness was 21 mm, dynamic stereoacuity decreased as the viewing angle increased, especially, that of at $15^{\circ}$ decreased significantly (p<0.01) as compared with that of at $5^{\circ}$. The dynamic stereoacuity depending on the rod thickness have an increasing tendency as the rod thickness increased. Conclusions: The viewing angle between objects and the size of viewing object were factors that affect to dynamic stereoacuity.

목적: 주시물체간의 거리와 물체의 크기 변화가 동적입체시력에 변화를 주는 요인인지 확인하고자 하였다. 방법: 피검사자는 평균연령 $23.89{\pm}1.76$세의 37명(남26명, 여11명)이었다. 모든 피검사자는 완전교정된 안경을 착용하였으며, 교정시력은 0.9 이상이었다. 입체시력은 세막대검사를 실시하였고, 좌 우 막대간 시야각은 $5^{\circ}$, $10^{\circ}$, 그리고 $15^{\circ}$, 막대두께는 7 mm, 14 mm, 그리고 21 mm로 하여 각각의 조건을 설정하였다. 각 조건에서의 입체시력 측정은 2.5 m 거리에서 각각 3회 반복측정하여 평균값을 기록하였다. 결과: 막대두께가 7 mm, 14 mm일 때, 시야각이 커질수록 동적입체시력이 감소하였으며, 시야각 $5^{\circ}$와 비교하여 $10^{\circ}$$15^{\circ}$에서 각각 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.01). 막대두께가 21 mm일 때, 시야각이 커질수록 동적입체시력이 감소하였으며, 특히 시야각 $5^{\circ}$와 비교하여 $15^{\circ}$에서 유의하게 감소하였다(p<0.01). 막대두께에 따른 동적입체시력은 막대가 두꺼워질수록 입체시력이 증가하는 경향이었다. 결론: 주시물체간의 시야각과 주시물체의 크기는 동적입체시력에 영향을 주는 요인인 것으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Benjamin WJ. Borish's clinical refraction, 2nd Ed. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006;147-149.
  2. Wong BPH, Woods RL, Peli E. Stereoacuity at distance and near. Optom Vis Sci. 2002;79(12):771-778. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-200212000-00009
  3. Benjamin WJ. Borish's clinical refraction, 2nd Ed. St. Louis: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2006;921-957.
  4. Lovasik JV, Szymkiw M. Effects of aniseikonia, anisometropia, accommodation, retinal illumination, and pupillary size on stereopsis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1985;26(5):741-750.
  5. Rawlings SC, Shipley T. Stereoscopic acuity and horizontal angular distance from fixation. J Opt Soc Am. 1969;59(8):991-993. https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSA.59.000991
  6. Hirsch MJ, Weymouth FW. Distance discrimination: I. Theoretic considerations. Arch Ophthalmol. 1948;39(2):210-223. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1948.00900020215008
  7. Lim KH, Hong HJ. Dynamic stereoacuity in normal individuals. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;41(11):2408-2414.
  8. Shim HS, Kim SM, Kim SH, Kim YC. The comparasion of the dynamic stereoacuity with two-rods test and three-rods test. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2015;20(3):377-384. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2015.20.3.377
  9. Lee MA, Oh JM, Jeong JH. Dynamic visual acuity and dynamic stereoacuiy of athletes and nonathletes. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2009;14(3):43-49
  10. Shim MS, Kim SH, Kang HS, Shim HS. The study of kinetic visual acuity in college students. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2012;17(4):419-424.
  11. Shim HS, Kim SH, Kang HS. Changes in KVA resulting from correction condition of refractive error. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2013;18(2):165-171. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2013.18.2.165
  12. Kim YC, Shim HS, Kim SH. The comparative assessment of the KVA and dynamic stereoacuity. J Korean Ophthalmic Opt Soc. 2014;19(4):519-525. https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2014.19.4.519
  13. Grosvenor T. Primary Care Optometry, 5th Ed. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2007;79.
  14. Han KD. Effects of the difference in visual angle and contrast for three rod stereoacuity ability. MS Thesis. Kangwon National University, Samcheok. 2016;1-21.

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Dynamic Stereoacuity According to Monocular Cue vol.22, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.2.127
  2. Distribution of Stereopsis-Perceptible Critical Slope in Verhoeff Stereoptor Test vol.22, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2017.22.3.237
  3. Comparison of Dynamic Stereoacuity in Terms of Test Distance vol.23, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2018.23.4.423
  4. Comparison between Stereopsis Measured in a Natural Space and that Measured Using an Apparatus vol.24, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14479/jkoos.2019.24.1.71