DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Factors Affecting Nutrients Removal in Hybrid Constructed Wetland Treating Stormwater Runoff

강우 유출수 처리를 위한 하이브리드 인공습지의 영양물질 저감 인자 분석

  • Gurung, Sher Bahadur (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Geronimo, Franz Kevin F. (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Choi, Hyeseon (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Hong, Jungsun (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Kim, Lee-Hyung (Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • ;
  • ;
  • 최혜선 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 홍정선 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부) ;
  • 김이형 (공주대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Received : 2017.11.29
  • Accepted : 2018.02.06
  • Published : 2018.02.28

Abstract

Nutrients generated from various land uses lead to eutrophication during the influx of water, and it is necessary to apply the LID techniques to reduce nutrients from nonpoint sources in order to mitigate the occurrence of the algal bloom. This study was carried out to derive the design factors of hybrid artificial wetland (HCW) to increase the removal efficiency of nutrients. HCW system was constructed in the year 2010 for the treatment of rainfall runoffs from parking lots and roads composed of 100% impervious floors in the Cheonan campus of Kongju University. The average nutrients removal efficiency of TN and TP was 74% and 72%, respectively. Both TN and TP removal efficiencies were higher than those of free surface wetlands and subsurface flow wetlands due to activated physical and ecological mechanisms. The critical design parameters for the efficient nutrients removal in the artificial wetlands were the ratio of the surface area to the catchment area (SA/CA), land use, the rainfall runoff, and the rainfall intensity. The optimal carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio was estimated at 5: 1 to 10.3: 1. The results of this study can be applied to the efficient design of hybrid artificial wetlands to treat nutrients in urban runoff with high efficiency.

다양한 토지이용에서 발생된 영양염류는 수계 유입시 부영양화를 유발하며, 녹조발생의 원인물질이 되기에 비점오염원으로부터 영양염류를 저감하기 위한 LID 기법의 적용이 필요하다. 본 연구는 영양물질의 저감효율을 높이기 위한 하이브리드 인공습지(HCW)의 설계인자를 도출하고자 수행되었다. 하이브리드 인공습지는 공주대학교 천안캠퍼스내 100% 불투수층으로 이루어진 주차장 및 도로의 강우유출수 처리를 위하여 2010년에 조성되었으며, 현재까지 모니터링이 수행 중이다. 하이브리드 인공습지의 조성 이후 현재까지 수행 중인 모니터링 결과를 활용하여 산정한 TN의 평균 제거효율은 74%였으며, TP의 평균 제거효율은 72%로 나타났다. 이러한 TN 및 TP 제거효율은 일반적인 인공습지에 비하여 높은 제거효율이며 자유수면 습지 및 지표하 흐름습지에서의 활성화된 물리적 및 생태학적 기작에 기인한다. 하이브리드 인공습지의 효율적 영양물질 저감을 위한 중요설계인자는 유역면적 대비 시설면적의 비(SA/CA), 강우유출량, 강우강도 등으로 나타났으며, 영양물질 제거를 위한 최적 유입수의 C/N 비는 5:1에서 10.3:1로 산정되었다. 본 연구 결과는 도시지역의 강우유출수 내 영양염류를 고효율로 처리하고자 하는 하이브리드 인공습지의 효율적 설계에 사용 가능하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alihan, JC, Maniquiz, MCM, Choi, J, Flores, PED and Kim, LH, (2017). Characteristics and fate of Stormwater runoff pollutants on constructed wetlands. J. of wetlands research, 19(1), pp.37-44. [DOI https://DOI:10.17663/JWR.2017.19.1.037]
  2. American Public Health Association (APHA), American water works Association (AWWA) and Water Environment Association (WEF) (1992). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th edition Washington, DC, USA.
  3. Bastkiven, S, (2006). Nitrogen removal in treatment wetlands -Factors influencing spatial and temporal variations. Phd thesis, Department of Biology, IFM Linkoping University, Linkoping, Sweden.
  4. Birch, GF, Matthai, C, Fazeli, MS and Suh, JY, (2004) Efficiency of a constructed wetland in removing contaminants from stormwater wetland. WETLANDS, 24 (2), pp. 459-466. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2004)024[0459:EOACWI]2.0.CO;2
  5. Carleton, JN, Grizzard, TJ, Godrej, AN and Post, HE, (2001). Factors affecting the performance of stormwater treatment wetlands. Water Resource, 35(6), pp. 1552-1562.
  6. Chavan, PV and Dennett, KE, (2008). Wetland Simulation Model for Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Sediments Retention in Constructed Wetlands. Water Air Soil Pollution, 187 pp. 109-118. [DOI 10.1007/s11270-007-9501-2]
  7. Fisher, J and Acreman, MC, (2004). Wetland nutrients removal: a review of evidence. Hydrology and Earth system Science, 8(4), pp. 673-685. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-8-673-2004
  8. Flores, PED, Maniquiz, MCM, Geronimo, FKF, Alihan, JCP and Kim, LH, (2016a). Evaluation on the environmental effects of rain garden treating roof stormwater runoff. J. of wetlands research, 18(1), pp.10-15 [DOI :10.17663/JWR.2016.18.1.010].
  9. Flores, PED, Maniquiz, MCM, Geronimo, FKF, Alihan, JCP and Kim, LH, (2016b). Transport of nonpoint source pollutants and stormwater runoff in a hybrid rain garden system. J. of wetlands research, 18(4), pp.481-487 [DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2016.18.4.481].
  10. Ghosh, D and Gopal, B, (2010). Effect of hydraulic retention time on the treatment of secondary effluent in a subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecological Engineering 36, pp.1044-1051.[doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.04.017]
  11. Jordan, TE, Whigham, DF, Hofmockel, KH and Pittek, MA, (2003). Nutrient and Sediment Removal by a Restored Wetland Receiving Agricultural Runoff. J. of Environmental Quality, 32, pp. 1534-1547. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2003.1534
  12. Koch, BJ, Febria, CM, Gevrey, M, Wainger, LA and Palmer, MA, (2014). Nitrogen removal by stormwater management structures: A Data Synthesis. J. of the American water resource water resources association, 50(6). pp. 1594-1607. https://doi.org/10.1111/jawr.12223
  13. Kovacic, DA, David, MB, Gentry, LE, Starks, KM and Cooke, RA, (2000). Effectiveness of Constructed Wetlands in Reducing Nitrogen and Phosphorus Export from Agricultural Tile Drainage. J. of Environmental quality, 29(4), pp. 1262-1274. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2000.00472425002900040033x
  14. Lee, CG, Fletcher, TD and Sun, G, (2009). Nitrogen removal in constructed wetland systems. Engineering life science, 1, pp. 11-22 [DOI: 10.1002/elsc.200800049].
  15. Leisenring, M, Clary, J, Stephenson, J and Hobson, P, (2010). International Stormwater Best Management Practices (BMP) Database Pollutant Category Summary: Nutrients. BMP Database report Geosyntec Consultants, Inc. and Wright Water Engineers, Inc., pp. 3-11.
  16. Lu, S, Zhang, P, Jin, X, Xiang, C, Gui, M, Zhang, J and Li, F, (2009). Nitrogen removal from agricultural runoff by full-scale constructed wetland in China. Hydrobiologia, 621, pp.115-126. [DOI 10.1007/s10750-008-9636-1]
  17. Maniquiz, MCM, Choi, JY, Lee, SY, Kang, CG, Yi, GS and Kim, LH, (2012). System design and treatment efficiency of a surface flow constructed wetland receiving runoff impacted stream water. Water Science and Technology, 65(3), pp. 525-532. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.869
  18. Maniquiz, MCM, Geronimo, FKF and Kim, LH, (2014). Investigation on the effectiveness of pretreatment in stormwater management technologies. J. of Environmental Science, 26, pp. 1824-1830 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2014.06.018]
  19. Rossen, R, Watts, A, Houle, J, Farah, K and Ballestero, T, (2010). Investigation of Nutrient Removal Mechanisms of a Constructed Gravel Wetland Used for Stormwater Control in a Northern Climate. Final Report by the University of New Hampshire Stormwater Center
  20. Sayadi, MH, Kargar, R, Doosti, MR and Salehi, H, (2012). Hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment: A worldwide review. Proceedings of the International Academy of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2(4): pp. 204-222 [DOI 10.1590/1678-4324-2016160506]
  21. Spieles, DJ and Mitsch, WJ, (2000). The effects of season and hydrologic and chemical loading on nitrate retention in constructed wetlands: a comparison of low- and high-nutrient riverine systems. Ecological Engineering, 14, pp. 77-91.
  22. Taylor, GD, Fletcher, TD, Wong, THF, Breen, PF and Duncan, HP, (2005). Nitrogen composition in urban runoff implications for storm water management. Water Research 39, 1982-1989.[doi:10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.022]
  23. Terzakis, S, Fountoulakis, MS, Georgaki, I, Albantakis, D, Sabathianakis, I, Karathanasis, AD, Kalogerakis, N and Manios, T, (2008). Constructed wetlands treating highway runoff in the central Mediterranean region. Chemosphere 72, pp. 141-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.02.044
  24. Vymazal, J, (2006). Removal of nutrients in various types of constructed wetlands. Science of the Total Environment, 380, pp. 48-65. [10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.09.014]
  25. Vymazal, J, (2010). Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment. Water ,2, pp.530-549.[Doi: 10.3390/w2030530]
  26. Vymazal, J, (2013). The use of hybrid constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment with special attention to Nitrogen removal: A review of a recent development. Water research, 47, pp.4795 - 4811 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.029]
  27. Weiner, RF and Matthews, RA, (2003). Environmental Engineering, Fourth Edition, Butterworth Heinemann Elseiver Science.
  28. Xinshan, S, Qin, L and Denghua, Y, (2010). Nutrient Removal by Hybrid Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetlands for High Concentration Ammonia Nitrogen Wastewater. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 2, pp. 1461-1468. [DOI:10.1016/j.proenv.2010.10.159]
  29. Zhao, Y, Zhang, Y, Ge, Z, Hu, C and Zhang, H, (2013). Effects of influent C/N ratios on wastewater nutrient removal and simultaneous greenhouse gas emission from the combinations of vertical subsurface flow constructed wetlands and earthworm eco-filters for treating synthetic wastewater. Environmental Science Process impacts, 16, pp. 567-575 [DOI: 10.1039/c3em00655g]