The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Retrospective study on marginal bone resorption around immediately loaded implants

즉시 하중 임플란트에서 변연골 흡수량에 관한 후향적 연구

  • Lee, Sung-Hoon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Jung, Ji-Hye (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Lee, Jin-Han (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University) ;
  • Cho, Hye-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Wonkwang University)
  • 이성훈 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 정지혜 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이진한 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 조혜원 (원광대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2018.01.31
  • Accepted : 2018.03.15
  • Published : 2018.04.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: Patients who treated implant immediate loading within a week after implant placement at Wonkwang University Dental Hospital Implant Center were evaluated marginal bone resorption. These retrospective analyses are intended to reinforce the clinical evidence for the implant immediate loading. Materials and methods: Medical history and radiographic data were investigated, which were the patients' who treated implant immediate loading and restoration with provisional prostheses between January 2005 and June 2016, at Wonkwang University Dental Hospital Implant Center. Total number of implants was 70, marginal bone resorption was measured according to implant length, diameter and connection type. To measure marginal bone resorption, periapical radiographs were taken when the implants were placed and after 6 month. Statistical analysis was done in Mann-whitney U test and Kruskal-wallis test with SPSS 22.0 software (P<.05). Results: Mean marginal bone resorption around immediately loaded implants according to implant connection type was shown $1.24{\pm}0.72mm$ in internal hexagon connection type and $1.73{\pm}1.27mm$ in external hexagon connection type. There was no statically significant difference in marginal bone resorption with implant length and diameter. Conclusion: Implants with immediated loading in internal hexagon connection type showed less marginal bone resorption significantly than in external hexagon connection type.

목적: 원광대학교 치과대학병원 임플란트 센터에서 임플란트를 식립한 후 1주일 내에 임시보철물을 수복한 다음, 즉시 하중을 가한 환자들을 대상으로 골 흡수량을 측정하고자 하였다. 이러한 후향적 분석을 통하여 임플란트에 대한 즉시 하중의 임상적 근거를 보강하고 주의해야 할 사항 등을 파악하고자 하였다. 대상 및 방법: 2005년 1월 1일부터 2016년 6월 31일 사이에 원광대학교 치과대학병원 임플란트 센터에서 임플란트를 식립한 후 1주일 내에 임시보철물을 수복한 환자들을 대상으로 하여 진료기록부와 방사선 사진을 조사하였다. 총 임플란트의 수는 70개였으며, 임플란트의 제조회사, 길이, 직경, 체결 방식에 따른 변연골의 흡수량을 측정하였다. 변연골의 흡수량을 측정하기 위해 임플란트 식립 직후와 6개월 이후의 치근단 방사선 사진을 비교 분석하였다. 통계 프로그램인 SPSS 22.0을 이용하여 Mann-whitney U test와 Kruskal-wallis test를 시행하였다. 결과: 즉시 하중 임플란트 군에서 임플란트와 지대주의 연결 구조에 따른 변연골 흡수량을 비교한 결과 내부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서의 변연골 흡수량은 평균 $1.24{\pm}0.72mm$, 외부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서 $1.73{\pm}1.27mm$로 나타났으며 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보였다. 임플란트 제조회사, 길이, 직경에 따른 변연골 흡수량의 차이는 통계적으로 유의한 차이를 보이지 않았다. 결론: 즉시 하중 임플란트에서 내부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서의 변연골 흡수량은 외부 육각 연결 구조 임플란트에서의 변연골 흡수량보다 적게 나타났으며, 임플란트의 다른 조건들에서는 변연골 흡수량에 차이를 보이지 않았다.

Keywords

References

  1. Cochran DL. The evidence for immediate loading of implants. J Evid Based Dent Pract 2006;6:155-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2006.04.018
  2. Bergman B. Evaluation of the results of treatment with osseointegrated implants by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:114-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90176-2
  3. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Dula K, Lang NP. Clinical experience with one-stage, non-submerged dental implants. Adv Dent Res 1999;13:153-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374990130010501
  4. Schnitman PA, Wohrle PS, Rubenstein JE. Immediate fixed interim prostheses supported by two-stage threaded implants: methodology and results. J Oral Implantol 1990;16:96-105.
  5. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Maghaireh H, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: different times for loading dental implants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;(3):CD003878.
  6. Branemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, Ohman A. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl 1977;16:1-132.
  7. Malchiodi L, Cucchi A, Ghensi P, Nocini PF. Evaluation of the esthetic results of 64 nonfunctional immediately loaded postextraction implants in the maxilla: correlation between interproximal alveolar crest and soft tissues at 3 years of followup. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:130-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00424.x
  8. Chaushu G, Chaushu S, Tzohar A, Dayan D. Immediate loading of single-tooth implants: immediate versus non-immediate implantation. A clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001;16:267-72.
  9. Bragger U, Burgin W, Lang NP, Buser D. Digital subtraction radiography for the assessment of changes in peri-implant bone density. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:160-6.
  10. Queiroz PM, Oliveira ML, Tanaka JL, Soares MG, Haiter-Neto F, Ono E. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2016;45:20160120. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20160120
  11. Misch CE, Perel ML, Wang HL, Sammartino G, Galindo-Moreno P, Trisi P, Steigmann M, Rebaudi A, Palti A, Pikos MA, Schwartz-Arad D, Choukroun J, Gutierrez-Perez JL, Marenzi G, Valavanis DK. Implant success, survival, and failure: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. Implant Dent 2008;17:5-15. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e3181676059
  12. Galindo-Moreno P, Fernandez-Jimenez A, O'Valle F, Monje A, Silvestre FJ, Juodzbalys G, Sanchez-Fernandez E, Catena A. Influence of the crown-implant connection on the preservation of peri-implant bone: a retrospective multifactorial analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:384-90. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3804
  13. Tsouknidas A, Lympoudi E, Michalakis K, Giannopoulos D, Michailidis N, Pissiotis A, Fytanidis D, Kugiumtzis D. Influence of alveolar bone loss and different alloys on the biomechanical behavior of internal-and external-connection implants: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2015;30:e30-42. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.3814
  14. Chun HJ, Shin HS, Han CH, Lee SH. Influence of implant abutment type on stress distribution in bone under various loading conditions using finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:195-202.
  15. Buser D, Mericske-Stern R, Bernard JP, Behneke A, Behneke N, Hirt HP, Belser UC, Lang NP. Long-term evaluation of non-submerged ITI implants. Part 1: 8-year life table analysis of a prospective multi-center study with 2359 implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:161-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080302.x
  16. Ellegaard B, Kolsen-Petersen J, Baelum V. Implant therapy involving maxillary sinus lift in periodontally compromised patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:305-15. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080409.x
  17. Feldman S, Boitel N, Weng D, Kohles SS, Stach RM. Fiveyear survival distributions of short-length (10 mm or less) machined-surfaced and Osseotite implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:16-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00023.x
  18. Lemmerman KJ, Lemmerman NE. Osseointegrated dental implants in private practice: a long-term case series study. J Periodontol 2005;76:310-9. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2005.76.2.310
  19. Pierrisnard L, Renouard F, Renault P, Barquins M. Influence of implant length and bicortical anchorage on implant stress distribution. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2003;5:254-62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2003.tb00208.x
  20. Degidi M, Piattelli A. Immediate functional and non-functional loading of dental implants: a 2- to 60-month follow-up study of 646 titanium implants. J Periodontol 2003;74:225-41. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2003.74.2.225
  21. Ding X, Zhu XH, Liao SH, Zhang XH, Chen H. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont 2009;18:393-402. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00453.x
  22. Ding X, Liao SH, Zhu XH, Zhang XH, Zhang L. Effect of diameter and length on stress distribution of the alveolar crest around immediate loading implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2009;11:279-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2008.00124.x
  23. Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, Konvickova S. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: a finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2004;91:20-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2003.08.008