Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회논문지)

The Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society (한국산학기술학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Necessity of Verification about depot level maintenance plan through the Weapons System cases analysis

무기체계 사례 분석을 통한 창정비개발계획안 검증 필요성 연구

  • Received : 2018.11.03
  • Accepted : 2019.02.01
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study has done to search for a solution to remove risk limitedly caused by separating weapon system acquisition from operation and maintenance at the view point of Logistic Commander who's responsible for stable operation and maintenance after acquiring weapon system. At the System development stage, unverified overhaul development plan may cause additional manpower and costs after the development, and furthermore it is likely to have risk to lower reliability of the military. Thus, research and development agency should write overhaul development plan at the System development stage, and it should be verified through evaluation and verification test. Secondly, during research and development, institutional supplementation is needed to calculate human and material resources writing overhaul development plan. Thirdly, it should be able to analyze proper operation & maintenance plan and cost for overhaul plan at the pre-investigation stage. Fourthly, the base which can develop overhaul concept and overhaul factors should be included in the need and need determination document. Lastly, for the weapon system which has small amount of high power figure, project management should be performed to be able to specify at the each acquisition level of weapon system to realize Article 28, clause 3 and 4 of Defense business law.

무기체계 획득이후 안정된 운영유지의 책임이 있는 전략적 수준의 군수사의 관점에서 무기체계의 획득과 운영유지 분리에 따른 RISK를 제한적으로 해소하기 위한 방안을 연구하였다. 체계개발 단계에서 검증되지 않는 창정비개발계획안은 체계개발 종료 후 비용분석 등의 별도 검증을 위한 추가적인 인력 및 비용이 수반되고 더 나아가 군의 신뢰가 저하될 RISK를 가지고 있다. 이에 체계개발 단계에서 창정비개발계획안을 연구개발기관이 작성하여 입증 및 확증시험을 통해 검증되어져야 한다. 둘째, 체계개발 단계에서 창정비개발계획안이 작성될 수 있도록 연구개발주관기관의 투입되는 자원이 반영 및 정산될 수 있는 제도적 보완이 필요하다. 셋째, 선행연구 단계에서 창정비 방안에 대한 사업분석과 비용분석을 수행할 수 있어야 한다. 넷째, 소요 및 소요결정 문서에 창정비 개념과 창정비요소를 개발할 수 있는 근거를 반영하여야 한다. 다섯째, 소량의 전력지수가 높은 무기체계는 방위사업법 시행령 제28조 3항과 4항을 실현하기 위해 무기체계 획득단계별 구체화 될 있도록 사업관리를 수행하여야 하겠다.

Keywords

Table 1. Depotmaintenance plan’s contents

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_76_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Depotmaintenance policy decision process

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_76_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Period of Depotmaintenance policy creation and decision

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_76_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Development cost for Military Depot Level Maintenance(CAAS)

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_76_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Development cost for Military Depot Level Maintenance(Army Logistics Command)

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n2_76_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. The Government Organization Act, No 33, 2018.
  2. Jongha Kim, "Current Status and Problems of Defense Acquisition System and Direction of Development", Policies of Defense Science and Technology, p. 47, 2017.
  3. "Field Teaching Method Operation 6-1, Operation Sustainment Support", p. 2-1, Army HQ, 2015.
  4. "Defense Program Management Law", No 299, DAPA, 2017.
  5. "The Guidebook of Integrated Logistics Support Practice", p. 236, Army Logistics Command, 2018.
  6. "Defense Program Management Law", No 313, No 314, DAPA, 2017.
  7. Seungpil Jung, Jungjun An, "Ways to develop ILS work for operation sustainment crisis management", Logistics Newspaper Edition, Vol 43, p.134, 2017.
  8. Jongha Kim, "The Strategic Backgrounds of Losing U.S Military Trainer Jet Bid", Munhwa Newspaper, p. 39, Oct 2. 2018.
  9. Jongha Kim, "Current Status and Problems of Defense Acquisition System and Direction of Development", Policies of Defense Science and Technology, pp. 46-51, 2017.
  10. Enforcement Decree of The Defense Acquisition Program Act, No 28, 2018.