한국비블리아학회지 (Journal of the Korean BIBLIA Society for library and Information Science)

한국비블리아학회 (Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

5G 정보환경 정보전문가를 위한 윤리 리터러시 교육과정 모형연구

Ethics-Literacy Curriculum Modeling for Ethical Practice of 5G Information Professionals

  • 유사라 (서울여자대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2022.02.17
  • 심사 : 2022.03.02
  • 발행 : 2022.03.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 5G 신기술에 가장 민감한 세대의 윤리 행태를 권장하는 일환으로 미래 정보전문가를 희망하는 주체를 위한 윤리 리터러시(Ethics-Literacy) 교육과정모형 개발을 목적으로 한다. 연구 범위의 핵심 주제인 5G 특성, 리터러시, 윤리 쟁점, 6C 역량기반 교육, 이용자 경험 등을 주제어로 최근 5년 이내(2022-2017) 출간된 국내외 학술 연구자료를 조사하고 내용분석으로 최종 86편을 연구대상으로 선정하여 문헌 연구가 진행되었다. 분석 결과가 제시하는 것은 첫째, 기존의 리터러시는 5G 환경에 대응된 네 영역으로 구분될 수 있고 둘째, 분석된 윤리 쟁점은 모든 리터러시 영역에서 보이는 공통 쟁점과 각 리터러시 영역별 특수 쟁점으로 비교 구분되었다. 분석된 결과와 4차 산업혁명 교육방식으로 제시된 6C 역량기반 교육을 바탕으로 대학 차원의 5G 정보환경 정보전문가를 위한 윤리 리터러시 교육과정모형을 개발하여 제시하였다.

Ethical Issues increase when people engage in smart technological systems such as 5G, IoT, Cloud computing services and AI applications. Range of this research is comparison of various literacy concepts and its ethical issues in considering of 5G features and UX. 86 research papers and reports which have been published within the recent 5 years (2017-2022), relating the research subject, are investigated and analyzed. Two results show that various literacies can be grouped into four areas and that some of common issues among those areas as well as unique issues of each area are identified. Based on the literature analysis, an Operational Definition of Ethics-Literacy is presented and the model of ethics-literacy curriculum supporting ethical behavior of 5G information professionals is developed and suggested.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2020년도 서울여자대학교 연구년 수혜 및 2022년도 교내연구비 지원을 받았음.

참고문헌

  1. Choi, S. S. & Hong, A. R. (2021). Identifying issue changes of AI chatbot 'Iruda' case and its implications. Electronic and Telecommunications Trends, 36(2), 93-101. https://doi.org/10.22648/ETRI.2021.J.360210
  2. Han, S. W. (2018). A study about the concept of data literacy model based on digital humanities. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 35(4), 223-236. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.4.223
  3. Han, S. W. (2020). A study on design of data literacy model based on digital humanities. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 37(1), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.1.179
  4. Hollister, J. M. (2019). An ethnographic study on the digital literacy practices of role-players in massively multiplayer online. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(4), 429-467. https://doi.org/10.16981/KLISS.50.4.201912.429
  5. Hollister, J. M. (2020). The information worlds of online role-players. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 32(1), 223-266. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2020.31.2.223
  6. Hong, S. & Chang, W. (2017). A study on the perception of official document literacy and archival literacy. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(3), 125-150. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.3.125
  7. Jang, Y. K. (2018). Aligning academic library makerspaces with digital literacy education spaces. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 425-446. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.425
  8. Jung, Y. M. (2018). A study on digital literacy education for adults in US public libraries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 51(1), 359-380. http://dx.doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.1.359
  9. Kim, J. H. (2018). A content analysis of research data management training programs at the university libraries in north america: focusing on data literacy competencies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(4), 7-36. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.4.007
  10. Lee, G. S. (2021). Social problems leted by chatbot 'ILuda': uploading the manual of human right to artificial intelligence. Cultural Science, 105, 183-198.
  11. Lee, J. M. (2019). Re-approach to the concept of data literacy and its application to library information services. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 53(1), 159-179. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2019.53.1.159
  12. Lee, J. M. (2021). An exploratory study on the establishment and provision of universal literacy for sustainable development in the era of fake news. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 85-106. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.085
  13. Lee, K. H. (2020). A study on the direction and method of moral and ethical education based on multiplatform. Educational Research, 79, 55-74. http://doi.org/10.17253/swueri.2020.79..003
  14. Lee, S. M. (2021). Effect of media literacy on the formation of smart divide. Journal of the Korean Society for information Management, 38(2), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.2.019
  15. Ministry of Education (2022). The Code of Ethics of AI for Human Growth (Draft). Available: http://asq.kr/aicechannel
  16. Park, J. H. & Kang, B. S. (2020). A study on the development of media information literacy concept and educational contents. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 51(3), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.51.3.202009.223
  17. Park, J. H. & Ranasinghe, W. M. (2021). A study on exploring digital information service method through analysis of PISA 2018 reading literacy assessment framework. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.135
  18. Park, J. H. (2018). A study on the development of conceptualization model for reading, information, ICT, and digital literacy. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 49(2), 267-300. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.49.201806.267
  19. Park, J. H. (2020). An exploration for direction of the curriculum development through the analysis of media information literacy competencies and contents. Journal of the Korean society for information management, 37(2), 119-144. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2020.37.2.119
  20. Park, J. H. (2021a). A study on exploring digital information service method through analysis of pisa 2018 reading literacy assessment framework. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 135-159. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.135
  21. Park, J. H. (2021b). An analysis and implications exploration of media and information literacy (MIL) curriculum in the philippines. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 331-355. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.52.2.202106.331
  22. Park, J. H., Park, S., & Kang, B. (2019). A study on the development of media type according to media concept and classification criteria. Journal of the Korean society for information management, 36(3), 81-107. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2019.36.3.081
  23. So, B. S. & Kim, H. J. (2021). Use and protection of personal information on social media: focusing on the personal information infringement case of the AI chat robot 'Iruda'. The Journal of Legal Studies, 24(1), 179-207.
  24. Yoo, S. R. (2018). A diagnostic analysis of lis curriculum from the meta-literacy perspective. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 52(2), 191-220. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2018.52.2.191
  25. Antoniou, J.(eds.) (2021). Quality of Experience and Learning in Information Systems. Gewerbestrasse: Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
  26. Austin, L. & Jin, Y.(eds.) (2018). Social Media and Crisis Communication. New York: Routledge.
  27. Bawden, D. & Robinson, L. (2020). The dearest of our possessions: appying floridi's information privacy concept in models of information behabiore and information literacy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 71(9), 1030-1043.
  28. Boyd, D. & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data: provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
  29. Bradley, F. (2016) 'A world with universal literacy' The role of libraries and access to information in the UN2030 Agenda. IFLA Journal, 42(2), 118-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035216647393
  30. Carlson, J. & Johnston, L. R. (2015). Data Information Literacy: Librarians, Data, and the Education of a New Generations of Researchers. Wesst Laffayette, Indian: Perdue University Press.
  31. Erfani, S. S., Abedin, B., & Yvette, B. (2017). Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(5), 1308-1322.
  32. Floridi, L. (2016). On human dignity as a foundation for the right to privacy. Philosopy and Technology, 29(4), 307-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-016-0220-8
  33. Fonseca, F. (2021). Whether or when: the question on the use of theories in data science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 72(12), 1593-1604.
  34. Fonseca, F., Marcinkowski, M., & Davis, C. (2019). Cyber-human systems of thought and understanding. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 70(4), 402-411.
  35. Fontichiaro, K. & Oehrli, J. A. (2016). Why literacy matters. Knowledge Quest, 44(5), 21-27.
  36. Freeman, L. (2006). The Development of Social Network Analysis, Empirical Press, Vancouver.
  37. Golinkoff, R. M. & Pasek, K. H. (2016). Becoming Brilliant: What Science Tells us About Raising Successful Children (APA Lifetools: Books for the General Public). American Psychological Association (APA).
  38. Gupa, M. S. (2020). What is Digitization, Digitalization, and Digital Transformation?. ARC Advisory. Available: http://www.arcweb.com/blog/what-digitization-digitalization-digital-transformation
  39. Haimson, O. L., Carter, A. J., Corvite, S., Wheeler, B, Wang, L., Liu, T., & Lige, A. (2021). The major life events taxanomy: social readjustment, social media information sharing, and online network separation during ties of life transition. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 72(7), 933-947. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24455
  40. Hemphill, L., Hedstrom, M., & Susan, H. L. (2021). Saving social media data: understanding data management practices among social media researcher and their imlications for archives. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 72(1), 97-109.
  41. Hu, W., Lee, J. H., Bainbridge, D., Choi, K., Organisciak, P., & Stephen, D. J. (2017). The MIREX grand challenge: a framework of holistic user-experience evaluation in music information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(1), 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23618
  42. Jeng, W., Goodwin, S., He, D., & Li, L. (2017). Information exchange on an academic social networking site: a multidiscipline comparison on researchgate Q&A. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 638-652. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23692
  43. Kousha, K. & Thelwall, M. (2017). Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(3), 762-779.
  44. Larosiliere, G. D., Carter, L. D., & Meske, C. (2017). How does the world connect? exploring the global diffusion of social network sites. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 68(8), 1875-1885. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23804
  45. Ma, J. & Lund, B. (2021). The evolution and shift of reserch topics and methods in library and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1059-1074.
  46. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2011). Reframing information literacy as a metaliteracy. College & Research Libraries, 72(1), 62-78. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-76r1
  47. Mackey, T. P. & Jacobson, T. E. (2014). Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information Literacy to Empower Learners. Chicago, IL: American Library Association.
  48. Marcinkowski, M. (2016). Data, ideology and and the developing critical program of social informatics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 67(5), 1266-1275.
  49. Reynolds, G. W. (2015). Ethics in Information Technology. MA: Cengage Learning.
  50. Ridsdale, C., Rothwell, J., Smit, M., Ali-Hassan, H., Bliemel, M., Irvine, D., Kelley, D., Matwin, S., & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Strategies and best practices for data literacy education, Dalhousie University. Available: https://dalspace.library.dal.ca/handle/10222/64578
  51. Ryan, M., Antoniou, J., Brooks, L., Jiya, T., Macnish, K., & Stahl, B. (2019). Technofixing the future: ethical side effects of using AI and big data computing, internet of people and smart city innovation. Leicester, UK, 335-341. https://doi.org/10.1109/SmartWorld-UIC-ATC-SCALCOM-IOP-SCI.2019.00101
  52. Savolainen, R. (2011). Judging the quality and credibility of information in internet discussion forums. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1243-1256. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21546
  53. Smutny, Z. & Vehovar, V. (2020). Social informatics research: schools of thought, methodological basis, and thematic conceptualization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 71(5), 529-539.
  54. Twitter (2011, September 12). One Hundred Million Voices. Available: http://blog.Twitter.com/2011/09/one-hundred-million-voices.html
  55. Wang, P. & Li, X. (2020). Assessing the quality of information on wikipedia: a deep-learning approach. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 71(1), 16-28.
  56. Wang, Q. (2018). A bibliometrics model for identifying emerging research topics. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 69(2), 290-304.
  57. Worrall, A., Cappello, A., & Rachel Osolen (2021). The importance of socio-emotional considerations in online communities, social informatics, and information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 72(10), 1247-1260.