DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of temporary weaning and creep feeding on calf growth and the reproductive efficiency of their Hereford dams

  • Cruz, R. Santa (Meat and wool Production national research program, INIA Tacuarembo) ;
  • De Barbieri, I. (Meat and wool Production national research program, INIA Tacuarembo) ;
  • Olmo, V. Morales (Centro Universitario Tacuarembo) ;
  • Montossi, F. (Meat and wool Production national research program, INIA Tacuarembo) ;
  • Vinoles, C. (Meat and wool Production national research program, INIA Tacuarembo)
  • Received : 2021.08.26
  • Accepted : 2022.02.10
  • Published : 2022.10.01

Abstract

Objective: The objective was to test if creep feeding (CF) improves the average daily gain (ADG) and weaning weight of calves submitted to temporary weaning (TW) and if the combination of CF and TW improves conception and pregnancy rates of cows. Methods: Primiparous (n = 74) and primiparous and multiparous (n = 104) cows grazing native grasslands were used in experiment 1 and 2; respectively. The experimental design was in plots divided into complete random blocks with two replications. The CF was the big plot and TW the small plot, thus four experimental groups were formed: i) -CF-TW (n = 21 and 27); ii) -CF+TW (n = 16 and 24); iii) +CF-TW (n = 20 and 26); iv) +CF+TW (n = 17 and 27) with cow-calf pairs for experiments 1 and 2; respectively. Nose plate application for TW had a duration of 14 and 15 days for experiment 1 and 2: respectively. In experiment 1, calves were fed at 1% of live weight for 112 days using a commercial supplement with 18.4% crude protein. In experiment 2, the supplementation lasted 98 days, and was carried out with corn dried distillers grains with soluble (DDGS) at 40% of the potential intake on a daily basis. Results: The TW reduced ADG during the TW period and the following 14 days, but the negative effect of TW was maintained until the final weaning only in experiment 2. The CF increased ADG during TW period in both experiments. The TW promoted an earlier conception of the dams (12 days in -CF treatment and 19 days in +CF treatment, p<0.01) and CF increased pregnancy rate in experiment 1, being the effects not consistent between experiments. Conclusion: The CF consistently promoted an increase in ADG during the period of TW and increased final weaning weight of calves, therefore it is economically viable.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA). The authors would like to acknowledge the staff of Glencoe Experimental Station, especially Pablo Cuadro. The authors would also like to acknowledge Victoria de Brun and Paul Kenyon for their professional guidance during the postgraduate course this paper was drafted.

References

  1. Burns BM, Fordyce G, Holroyd RG. A review of factors that impact on the capacity of beef cattle females to conceive, maintain a pregnancy and wean a calf-Implications for reproductive efficiency in northern Australia. Anim Reprod Sci 2010;122:1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2010.04.010
  2. Montiel F, Ahuja C. Body condition and suckling as factors influencing the duration of postpartum anestrus in cattle: a review. Anim Reprod Sci 2005;85:1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2003.11.001
  3. Wettemann RP. Precalving nutrition/birth weight interaction and rebreeding efficiency. Proceedings Range Beef Cow Symposium XIII, Cheyenne, WY, USA; 1993.
  4. Allen VG, Batello C, Berretta EJ, et al. An international terminology for grazing lands and grazing animals. Grass Forage Sci 2011;66:2-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00780.x
  5. Do Carmo M, Sollenberger LE, Carriquiry M, Soca P. Controlling herbage allowance and selection of cow genotype improve cow-calf productivity in Campos grasslands. Prof Anim Sci 2018;34:32-41. https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2016-01600
  6. Quintans G, Banchero G, Carriquiry M, Lopez-Mazz C, Baldi F. Effect of body condition and suckling restriction with and without presence of the calf on cow and calf performance. Anim Prod Sci 2010;50:931-8. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1071/AN10021
  7. De Nava G. The effects of restricted suckling and prepartum nutritional level on reproductive performance of primiparous crossbred beef cows. Wellington, New Zealand: Massey University; 1994.
  8. Vizcarra JA, Ibanez W, Orcasberro R. Repeatability and reproducibility of two scales to estimate the body condition of Hereford cows. Investig Agronomicas 1986;7:45-7.
  9. Quintans G, Vazquez AI, Weigel KA. Effect of suckling restriction with nose plates and premature weaning on postpartum anestrous interval in primiparous cows under range conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 2009;116:10-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2008.12.007
  10. Cremin JD, Faulkner DB, Merchen NR, Fahey Jr. GC, Fernando RL, Willms CL. Digestion criteria in nursing beef calves supplemented with limited levels of protein and energy. J Anim Sci 1991;69:1322-31. https://doi.org/10.2527/1991.6931322x
  11. Vinoles C, Jaurena M, De Barbieri I, Do Carmo M, Montossi F. Effect of creep feeding and stocking rate on the productivity of beef cattle grazing grasslands. NZ J Agric Res 2013;56: 279-87. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2013.840320
  12. Carvalho VV, Paulino MF, Detmann E, et al. A meta-analysis of the effects of creep-feeding supplementation on performance and nutritional characteristics by beef calves grazing on tropical pastures. Livest Sci 2019;227:175-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2019.07.009
  13. Aguiar AD, Vendramini JMB, Arthington JD, et al. Limited creep-feeding supplementation effects on performance of beef cows and calves grazing limpograss pastures. Livest Sci 2015;180:129-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.08.008
  14. NRC. Minerals. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: seventh revised edition. Washington, DC, USA: The National Academies Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.17226/9825
  15. Gutierrez V, Espasandin AC, Astessiano AL, Casal A, LopezMazz C, Carriquiry M. Calf foetal and early life nutrition on grazing conditions: metabolic and endocrine profiles and body composition during the growing phase. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2013;97:720-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2012.01314.x
  16. Mieres J. ADIN and ICP, What are they, what do they measure and how are they calculated? Hoja Divulg No 40, INIA 1996:2.
  17. Haydock KP, Shaw NH. The comparative yield method for estimating dry matter yield of pasture. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 1975;15:663-70. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9750663
  18. Sollenberger LE, Moore JE, Allen VG, Pedreira CGS. Reporting forage allowance in grazing experiments. Crop Sci 2005; 45:896-900. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0216
  19. Brownlie TS, Morton JM, McDougall S. Accuracy of fetal age estimates using transrectal ultrasonography for predicting calving dates in dairy cows in seasonally calving herds in New Zealand. NZ Vet J 2016;64:324-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/00480169.2016.1207573
  20. Ungerfeld R, Hotzel MJ, Scarsi a, Quintans G. Behavioral and physiological changes in early-weaned multiparous and primiparous beef cows. Animal 2011;5:1270-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111000334
  21. Miller N, Delbecchi L, Petitclerc D, Wagner GF, Talbot BG, Lacasse P. Effect of stage of lactation and parity on mammary gland cell renewal. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:4669-77. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72517-6
  22. Ramos Z, De Barbieri I, van Lier E, Montossi F. Body and wool growth of lambs grazing on native pastures can be improved with energy and protein supplementation. Small Rumin Res 2019;171:92-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2018.11.009
  23. Allen CC, Alves BRC, Li X, et al. Gene expression in the arcuate nucleus of heifers is affected by controlled intake of high- and low-concentrate diets. J Anim Sci 2012;90:2222-32. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2011-4684
  24. Gasser CL, Behlke EJ, Grum DE, Day ML. Effect of timing of feeding a high-concentrate diet on growth and attainment of puberty in early-weaned heifers. J Anim Sci 2006;84:3118-22. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2005-676
  25. Guggeri D, Meikle A, Carriquiry M, De Barbieri I, Montossi F, Vinoles C. Long-term effect of early nutrition on endocrine parameters and liver and endometrial gene expression of the members of the somatotrophic axis in Hereford heifers. Reprod Domest Anim 2018;53:930-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/rda.13190
  26. Guggeri D, Meikle A, Carriquiry M, Montossi F, De Barbieri I, Vinoles C. Effect of different management systems on growth, endocrine parameters and puberty in Hereford female calves grazing Campos grassland. Livest Sci 2014;167:455-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.06.026
  27. Lopes SA, Paulino MF, Detmann E, et al. Does supplementation of beef calves by creep feeding systems influence milk production and body condition of the dams? Trop Anim Health Prod 2016;48:1241-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-016-1083-9
  28. Carvalho VV. Preweaning nutritional effects of supplements on performance of suckling beef calves grazing tropical pastures. Minas Gerais, Brasil: Universidade Federal de Vicosa; 2018.
  29. Le Neindre P, D'Hour P. Effects of a postpartum separation on maternal responses in primiparous and multiparous cows. Anim Behav 1988;37:166-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(89)90023-7
  30. Baldwin RL, McLeod KR, Klotz JL, Heitmann RN. Rumen development, intestinal growth and hepatic metabolism in the pre- and postweaning ruminant. J Dairy Sci 2004;87:E55-65. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)70061-2
  31. Soca P, Rodriguez M, Olivera J, Villegas N, Claramunt M. Effect of Short-Term Energy Supplementation and Temporary Weaning on Follicular Size and Early Pregnancy in Primiparous Cows in Anestrus. XXXV Jornadas Uruguayas Buiatria, Paysandu, Uruguay: 2007, p. 303-5.