The Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회지)

Korean Academy of Sensory Integration (대한감각통합치료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study of Validity and Reliability of the Korean Translation Version of the Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC)

한글판 감각처리 및 자기조절 체크리스트(SPSRC)의 타당도와 신뢰도 연구

  • Kim, Ye-Eun (Raphael Child Development Center ) ;
  • Lee, Hye-Rim (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Min (Dept. of Occupational Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Daegu University)
  • 김예은 (라파엘 아동발달센터) ;
  • 이혜림 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 작업치료학과) ;
  • 이선민 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 작업치료학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.10
  • Accepted : 2023.12.08
  • Published : 2023.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : This study aims to verify the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC) for children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Methods : The Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient was calculated using Short Sensory Profile (SSP) to verify concurrent validity. Construct validity was verified by comparing the sensory processing ability and self-regulation ability of the two groups. Cronbach's α was calculated in the case of internal consistency for reliability verification, and the test-retest reliability was verified through the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results : Based on the verification of the concurrent validity, the Korean version of SPSRC and SSP showed a statistically significant correlation (p < 0.01). The construct validity was found to have a statistically significant difference between the two groups in the area and sub-items of the Korean version of SPSRC (p < 0.001). For the internal consistency, Cronbach's α ranged from 0.700 to 0.975. The test-retest reliability showed that the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.937 to 0.997. Conclusion : The Korean version of SPSRC was confirmed to be an evaluation tool with high validity and reliability. It is expected to be used as an evaluation tool for planning treatment goals in clinical trials and as a meaningful basis for future research.

목적 : 본 연구는 Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist(이하 SPSRC)의 국내사용을 위해 일반아동과 자폐스펙트럼장애(Autism Spectrum Disorder; ASD) 아동을 대상으로 타당도와 신뢰도 검증을 실시하였다. 연구방법 : 동시타당도를 검증하기 위해 Short Sensory Profile(SSP)을 사용하여 피어슨 적률 상관계수 (Product-moment correlation coefficient)를 산출하였다. 구성타당도는 두 집단의 감각처리능력과 자기조절능력을 비교하여 검증을 실시하였다. 신뢰도 검증을 위한 내적 일치도의 경우 Cronbach's α를 산출하였으며, 검사-재검사 신뢰도는 피어슨 상관계수(Pearson correlation coefficient)를 통해 검증하였다. 결과 : 동시타당도의 검증 결과 한글판 SPSRC와 SSP는 통계적으로 유의한 상관관계를 나타냈으며(p<.01), 구성타당도는 한글판 SPSRC의 영역 및 하위항목에 대해 두 집단이 통계적으로 유의한 차이가 있는 것으로 확인되었다(p<.001). 내적 일치도는 Cronbach's α값의 범위가 .700 ~ .975로 나타났으며, 검사재검사 신뢰도는 상관계수의 범위가 .937 ~ .997로 나타났다. 결론 : 한글판 SPSRC는 높은 타당도와 신뢰도를 가지는 평가도구로 확인되었다. 따라서 임상에서 치료목표를 계획하기 위한 평가도구로 사용되는 것 뿐만 아니라 향후 관련된 연구에 의미 있는 근거자료로 사용되기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Baranek, G. T. (2002). Efficacy of sensory and motor intervention for children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 32(5), 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020541906063
  2. Choi, J. H. (2010). Study of validity of korean version bruininks-oseretsky test of motor proficiency-2 (Master's thesis). Inje University, Gimhae.
  3. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(8), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
  4. Dunn, W. (2001). The sensations of everyday life: Empirical, theoretical, and pragmatic considerations. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 55(6), 608-620. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.55.6.608
  5. Dunn, W. (2007). Supporting children to participate successfully in every life by using sensory processing knowledge. Infants & Young Children, 20(2), 84-101. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.IYC.0000264477.05076.5d
  6. Gomez, I. B. B., Calsa, A. P., Esguerra, J. T., Penetrante, P. J. H., Porlucas, K., Santos, M. E., ... Lai, C. Y. Y. (2021). Psychometric properties of the sensory processing and self-regulation checklist: English version. Occupational Therapy International, 2021, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6658786
  7. Gomez, I. N. B., Arel, F. A., Asidao, J. M., Baguio, J. D., Nava, L., Rivera, D. A., ... Lai, C. Y. Y. (2021). Psychometric properties of the sensory processing and self-regulation checklist-tagalog version. Philippine Journal of Allied Health Sciences, 5(1), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.36413/pjahs.0501.004
  8. Gomez, I. N. B., Lai, C. Y. Y., Morato-Espino, P. G., Chan, C. C. H., & Tsang, H. W. H. (2017). Behavioural and autonomic regulation of response to sensory stimuli among children: A systematic review of relationship and methodology. BioMed Research International, 2017, 1-16.
  9. Gomez, I. N. B., Morato-Espino, P. G. G., & Lai, C. Y. Y. (2021). Examining the linguistic equivalency and cross-cultural adaptation of the sensory processing and self-regulation checklisttagalog version. Asian Journal Occupational Therapy, 17, 57-63.
  10. Greenspan, S. I., & Wieder, S. (1997). An integrated developmental approach to interventions for young children with severe difficulties in relating and communicating. Zero to Three, 17, 5-18.
  11. Humphry, R. (2002). Young children's occupations: Explicating the dynamics of developmental process. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(2), 171-179. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.56.2.171
  12. Kim, B. R., Kim, K. M., Chang, M. Y., & Hong, E. K. (2021). Study of construct validity and testretest reliability of the Korean version peabody developmental motor scale-second edition (PDMS-2). Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 19(3), 32-42. doi:10.18064/JKASI.2021.19.0.32
  13. Kim, E. K., Kim, E. K., Ko, Y. S., & Jeon, S. S. (2007). A pilot study on standardization of a Korean scales of the sensory profile for children with autistic disorders. Korean Journal of Special Education, 42(2), 91-123.
  14. Kim, M. S. (2001). A comparison of the sensory processing skills of typically developing children with developmental disability children (Master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  15. Kim, S. S. (2005). How to write a special education thesis. Seoul, Korea: Sigmapress.
  16. Kim, Y. E., Lee. H. R., & Lee, S. M. (2022). A content validity study of the Korean translation version of the sensory processing and self-regulation checklist (SPSRC). Journal of Korean Academy of Sensory Integration, 20(3), 27-37.
  17. Kim, Y. S. (2015). The development of self-regulation rating scale for early childhood (Doctoral dissertation). Chung-Ang University, Seoul.
  18. Kranowitz, C. (1998). The out-of-sync child: Recognizing and coping with sensory integration dysfunction. New York: The Berkley Publishing Group.
  19. Lai, C. Y. Y., & Chiu, A. S. M. (2013). Sensory processing and self-regulation checklist manual. Kwun Tong, Hong Kong: Heep Hong Society.
  20. Lai, C. Y. Y., Yung, T. W. K., Gomez, I. N. B., & Siu, A. M. H. (2019). Psychometric properties of Sensory Processing and Self-Regulation Checklist (SPSRC). Hindawi Occupational Therapy International. doi:10.1155/2019/8796042
  21. McIntosh, D. N., Miller, L. J., Shyu, V., & Dunn, W. (1999). Development and validation of the short sensory profile. In W. Dunn (Ed.), Sensory profile manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
  22. Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2021). Health and welfare statistical yearbook 2021. December, 2021. Retrieved from http://www.mohw.go.kr
  23. Oh, S. H., & Kim. B. J. (2002). New concept of validity for psychological assessment instruments and its usage. Korean Journal of Sport Psychology, 13(3), 111-126.
  24. Olson, S. L., Bates, J. E., & Bayles, K. (1990). Early antecedents childhood impulsivity the role of parent child interaction, cognitive competence, and temperament. Journal Abnormal Child Psychology, 8(3), 317-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00916568
  25. Park, J. H. (2010). A study on development and effectiveness to improve programs of self-regulation ability for young children: A study on the effect to improve of self-regulation ability and to reduce aggression (Doctoral dissertation). Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul.
  26. Park, K. Y., Yoo, E. Y., Jung, M. Y., Park, S. H., Lee, J. S., & Park, S. Y. (2011). Validation of the sensory profile for korean children with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 19(3), 1-12.
  27. Portney, L. G., & Watkins, M. P. (2009). Foundations of clinical research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  28. Roberts, J. E., King-Thomas, L., & Boccia, M. L. (2007). Behavioral indexes of the efficacy of sensory integration therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61, 555-562. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.61.5.555
  29. Silva, L. M., Schalock, M., & Ayres, R. (2011). A model and treatment for autism at the convergence of chinese medicine and western science: First 130 cases. Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine, 17(6), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11655-011-0635-0
  30. Yoo, E. Y., Jung, M. Y., Park, S. Y., & Choi, E. H. (2006). Current trends of occupational therapy assessment tool by Korean occupational therapist. Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 14(3), 27-37.