DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on University Students' Perception for Liberal Arts Class Using Padlet During the COVID-19

코로나 시기 패들렛 활용 교양 수업에 대한 학습자 인식 고찰

  • Ok Hee Park (Ju Si Gyeong Liberal Arts College, Pai Chai University)
  • 박옥희 (배재대학교 주시경대학 기초교육부)
  • Received : 2023.03.30
  • Accepted : 2023.04.20
  • Published : 2023.04.28

Abstract

This study aims to explore college students' perception for offline class using the online platform Padlet as a tool in liberal arts class during the COVID-19 lockdown. Thirty seven students participated in the study, and quantitative and qualitative methods were used. The statistical results and analysis for open-ended questions are as follows; Firstly, the participants showed satisfaction as the highest variable followed by learning effect, then motivation but participation rated the lowest(p< .001). Secondly, there was statistical significance except participation depending on gender(p< .001). Female students felt higher satisfaction, learning effect, and motivation than male students. Thirdly, there was statistical significance between freshmen and senior depending on grade(p< .001). Freshmen felt higher satisfaction, participation, learning effect, and motivation than seniors. Fourthly, qualitative analysis showed participants felt positive about using Padlet as a education tool in offline class. Finally, the pedagogical implication and suggestions were discussed.

본 연구의 목적은 코로나 팬데믹기간에 온라인 학습 도구 패들랫(Padlet)을 활용하여 대면으로 수업한 교양 과목에 대한 학습자의 인식을 조사하는데 있다. 연구방법은 B대학 재학생 37명을 대상으로 패들렛 활용 수업에 대한 만족도, 참여도, 학습 효과와 동기에 대해 양적 조사와 질적 조사를 실시하였다. 수집된 설문 자료는 SPSS 19.0 프로그램으로 통계 처리하였고, 개방형 질문은 중심어 위주로 분류하여 데이터를 분석하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 패들렛을 활용한 대면 수업에 대해 학습자의 인식은 통계적으로 유의하였다(p< .001). 수업만족도가 제일 높았고, 이어서 학습 효과와 동기 순으로 높았고 반면, 수업 참여도는 제일 낮았다. 둘째, 성별비교에서는 여학생이 참여도를 제외한 만족도, 학습 효과, 동기에서 통계적으로 유의하게 높았다(p< .001). 셋째, 학년 간 비교에서는 1학년과 4학년이 통계적으로 유의하였고(p< .001), 만족도, 참여도, 학습 효과, 동기에서 모두 1학년이 4학년 보다 높았다. 넷째, 개방형 질문에서 패들렛 활용 학습에 대한 만족도, 참여도, 학습 효과, 동기에 대해 학습자들은 긍정적인 데이터를 보였다. 연구결과를 토대로 제언 및 교육적 함의가 논의되었다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research grant of Pai Chai University in 2022.

References

  1. H. J. Chung, A. L. Kim, & H. N. Jpp. (2020). In the COVID-19 crisis, a study on the types of perceptions on online classes of college students. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 20(18), 1359-1381. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2020.20.18.1359
  2. O. H. Park. (2022). A study on university freshmen's academic emotions for untact general English class: focused on pre-recorded lecture vs. real time online class. Journal of Industrial Convergence, 20(11), 41-47. DOI : 10.22678/JIC.2022.20.11.041
  3. K. H. Kim. (2020). Study on the effects and limitations of blended learning-based college lectures in online courses. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 21(9), 67-83. DOI : 10.22251/jlcci.2021.21.9.67
  4. S. Y. Kim. (2021). Essay analysis on college students;' online/on-off mixed learning experience. Journal of Learner-CentereIndustrial Convertgence, 20(11), 41-47. DOI : 10.22678/JIC.2022.20.11.041
  5. G. M. Kim. (2021). The prospect of English education preparing for post-COVID: comparison of the effects of online and offline classes. Journal of the Korea English Education Society, 20(1), 39-59. DOI : 10.18649/jkees.2021.20.1.39
  6. J. D. Kim. (2020). Analysis of content through student response to face-to-face and untact instructions. Journal of the Edutainment, 2(2), 1-15. DOI : 10.36237/koedus.2.2.1
  7. H. W. Kim. (2020). A comparative study on the learner achievement of online and offline Korean classes-focusing on beginner vocabulary. The Journal of Korean language education research, 13, 19-35. DOI : 10.25022/RSKLE.2020.13. 019.
  8. H. S. Lee & E. H. Seo. (2021). A comparative study on the class satisfaction between remote video class and face-to-face class. The Korea contents association, 21(7), 440-447. DOI : 10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.07.440
  9. S. I. Cho. (2020). Comparison of academic achievement of classroom learning and on-line learning: a case study. The Journal of Business Education, 34(6), 23-39. DOI : 10.34274/Krabe.2022.34.6.002
  10. O. H. Park. (2022). A study on university freshmen's academic emotions for untact general English class: focused on pre-recorded lecture vs. real time online class. Journal of Industrial Convergence, 20(11), 41-47. DOI : 10.22678/JIC.2022.20.11.041
  11. H. J. Kim. (2022). A study on the use of Padlet in non face-to-face liberal arts English classes and university students' responses. Journal of English Teaching through Movies and media, 23(1), 1-12. DOI : 10.16875/stem.2022.23.1.1
  12. S. I. Chun. (2021). College students' perception of the learning effectiveness of Padlet. Studies in English Education, 26(3), 485-506. DOI : 10.22275/SEE.2021.26.3.05
  13. Y. H. Kim. (2022). A study on the use of Padlet by Japanese learners-focusing on tourism Japanese class in this COVID-19 era. Journal of Study on Japan, 57, 29-48. DOI : 10.20404/jscau.2022.08.57.29
  14. H. J. Lim. (2022). College students' academic achievement and class motivation on the use of Padlet in general English classes. Culture and Convergence, 44(6), 311-325. DOI : 10.33645/cnc.2022.6.44.6.311
  15. C. H. Roh. (2021). A study on interaction using Padlet in asynchronous online Korean course-focusing on the case of at cyber university. The Korean Language and Literature, 153, 99-123. DOI : 10.37967/emh.2021.9.153.99
  16. A. Baxter. (2008). The USA. Oxford Press: Cambridge: UK.
  17. N. M. M. Zainuddin, N. F. M. Azmi, R. C. M. Yusoff, S. A. Shariff & W. A. W. Hassan. (2020). Enhancing classroom engagement through Padlet as a learning tool: a case study. The Journal of Innovative Computing, 10(1), 49-57.
  18. E. S. Lee. (2022). A study on the perception of university students for non face-to-face classes-focused on 4-year university in Chungnam province. Korean Society for Holistic Convertgence Education, 26(1), 181-199. DOI : 10.35184/kshce.2022.26.1.181
  19. Y. J. Jeong. (2023). The liberal arts education in the post-pandemic era: from speed battle of digital transformation to sustainable future. The Journal of General Education, 22, 39-68. DOI : 10.24173/jge.2023.22.2.39