Animal Bioscience

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of physiochemical and nutrient profiles in canola feedstocks and co-products from bio-oil processing: impacted by source origin

  • Alessandra M. R. C. B. de Oliveira (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan) ;
  • Peiqiang Yu (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan)
  • Received : 2022.10.28
  • Accepted : 2023.01.26
  • Published : 2023.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to characterize physiochemical and nutrient profiles of feedstock and co-products from canola bio-oil processing that were impacted by source origin. The feedstocks and co-products (mash, pellet) were randomly collected from five different bio-oil processing plants with five different batches of samples in each bio-processing plant in Canada (CA) and China (CH). Methods: The detailed chemical composition, energy profile, total digestible nutrient (TDN), protein and carbohydrate subfractions, and their degradation and digestion (CNCPS6.5) were determined. Results: The results showed that TDN1x was similar in meals between CA and CH. CH meals and feedstock had higher, truly digestible crude protein (tdCP) and neutral detergent fiber (tdNDF) than CA while CA had higher truly digestible non-fiber carbohydrate (tdNFC). The metabolizable energy (ME3x), net energy (NELp3x, NEm3x, and NEg3x) were similar in meals between CA and CH. No differences were observed in energy profile of seeds between CA and CH. The protein and carbohydrate subfractions of seeds within CH were similar. The results also showed that pelleting of meals affected protein sub-fractionation of CA meals, except rapidly degradable fractions (PB1), rumen degradable (RDPB1) and undegrdable PB1 (RUPB1), and intestinal digestible PB1 (DIGPB1). Canola meals were different in the soluble (PA2) and slowly degradable fractions (PB2) between CA and CH. The carbohydrate fractions of intermediately degradable fraction (CB2), slowly degradable fraction (CB3), and undegradable fraction (CC) were different among CH meals. CH presented higher soluble carbohydrate (CA4) and lower CB2, and CC than CA meals. Conclusion: The results indicated that although the seeds were similar within and between CA and CH, either oil-extraction process or meal pelleting seemed to have generated significantly different aspects in physiochemical and nutrient profiles in the meals. Nutritionists and producers need to regularly check nutritional value of meal mash and pellets for precision feeding.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Brittany Dyck and Qin Guoqin (Canola Council of Canada) and Xuewei Zhang (Tianjing Agricultural University) for help sampling canola seed and canola meal in various crushers in Canada and China, Denise Beaulieu and Rex Newkirk for being in advisory committee, and Z. Niu (Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Saskatchewan) for technical assistance. The authors would like to acknowledge the University of Saskatchewan, the Rainer Dairy Research Facility, and Alexander Malcolm Shaw Memorial Graduate Scholarship (to AO). This article is part of student graduate thesis and made journal revisions.

References

  1. Eskin NAM. Rapeseed oil/canola. In: Caballero B, Finglas PM, Toldra F, editor. Encyclopedia of food and health. Academic Press; 2016. pp. 581-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384947-2.00585-7
  2. Maesoomi SM, Ghorbani GR, Alikhani M, Nikkhah A. Short communication: canola meal as a substitute for cottonseed meal in diet of midlactation Holsteins. J Dairy Sci 2006;89:1673-7. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72234-2
  3. Canola Council of Canada. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Challenges persist for canola seed exports to China; 2019. Available from: https://www.canolacouncil.org/news/challenges-persist-for-canola-seed-exports-to-china/
  4. Newkirk R. Meal nutrients composition. In: Daun JK, Eskin NAM, Hickling D, editors. Canola: chemistry, production, processing, and utilization, 2011. AOCS Press; 2011. pp. 229-44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-9818936-5-5.50012-7
  5. Piepenbrink MS, Schingoethe DJ. Ruminal degradation, amino acid composition, and estimated intestinal digestibilities of four protein supplements. J Dairy Sci 1998;81:454-61. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(98)75597-3
  6. White RR, Roman-Garcia Y, Firkins JL, et al. Evaluation of the National Research Council (2001) dairy model and derivation of new prediction equations. 2. Rumen degradable and undegradable protein. J Dairy Sci 2017;100:3611-27. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10801
  7. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle: 7th Revised Edition. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2001. Available from: http://nap.edu/9825
  8. National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirement of beef cattle, 7th edition. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press; 2000.
  9. Canadian Council on Animal Care (CCAC). Guide to the care and use of experimental animals, 2nd Ed., 1993. Canadian Council on Animal Care: Ottawa, ON, Canada.
  10. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists (International). 2019. Official Methods of Analysis (21st ed.). Washington, DC, USA: AOAC International; 2019. http://www.eoma.aoac.org/
  11. Licitra G, Hernandez TM, Van Soest PJ. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol 1996;57:347-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(95)00837-3
  12. Roe MB, Sniffen CJ, Chase LE. Techniques for measuring protein fractions in feedstuffs. In: Proceeding Cornell Nutrition Conference, 1990. Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. pp. 81-8.
  13. Higgs RJ, Chase LE, Ross DA, Van Amburgh ME. Updating the cornell net carbohydrate and protein system feed library and analyzing model sensitivity to feed inputs. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:6340-60. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9379
  14. Van Amburgh ME, Foskolos A, Collao-Saenz EA, Higgs RJ, Ross DA. Updating the CNCPS feed library with new feed amino acid profiles and efficiencies of use: evaluation of model predictions - Version 6.5, 2013. In: 75th Cornell Nutrition Conference for Feed Manufacturers; 2013. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/310770468_Updating_the_CNCPS_feed_library_with_new_feed_amino_acid_profiles_and_efficiencies_of_use_Evaluation_of_model_predictions_version_65
  15. Van Amburgh ME, Collao-Saenz EA, Higgs RJ, et al. The cornell net carbohydrate and protein system: updates to the model and evaluation of version 6.5. J. Dairy Sci 2015;98:6361-80. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9378
  16. Canadian Oilseed Processors Association (COPA). Trading rules for the North American sale of Bulk/Pelletized canoa meal [Internet]. Winnipeg MB, Canada: Canadian Oilseed Processors Association; 2020. Available from: https://copacanada.com/trading-rules/
  17. Canola Council of Canada (CCC) n.d. Annual report: resilient, responsive, ready. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: Canola Council of Canada; 2020. Available from: https://www.canolacouncil.org/download/146/annual-reports/17848/2020-resilientresponsive-ready_web
  18. Paula EM, Broderick GA, Danes MAC, Lobos NE, Zanton GI, Faciola AP. Effects of replacing soybean meal with canola meal or treated canola meal on ruminal digestion, omasal nutrient flow, and performance in lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2018;101:328-39. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13392
  19. Paula EM, Silva LG, Brandao VLN, Dai X, Faciola AP. Feeding canola, camelina, and carinata meals to ruminants. Animals 2019;9:704. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9100704
  20. Mustafa AF, Christensen DA, McKinnon JJ. The effects of feeding high fiber canola meal on total tract digestibility and milk production. Can J Anim Sci 1997;77:133-40. https://doi.org/10.4141/A96-074
  21. Broderick G, Faciola A, Armentano LE. Replacing dietary soybean meal with canola meal improves production and efficiency of lactating dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 2015;98:5672-87. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9563
  22. Park CS, Ragland D, Helmbrecht A, Htoo JK, Adeola O. Digestibility of amino acid in full-fat canola seeds, canola meal, and canola expellers fed to broiler chickens and pigs. J Anim Sci 2019;97:803-12. https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky470
  23. Tramontini RCM. Producao e congelacao de embrioes de cabras alimentadas com graos de canola [Master's Thesis] 2009. Universidade Estadual de Maringa. UEM Campus Repository http://repositorio.uem.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/1806
  24. Canadian Grain Commission (CGC). Quality of Western Canadian canola-2020. Winnipeg MB, Canada: Canadian Grain Commission; 2021. Available from: https://grainscanada.gc.ca/en/grain-research/export-quality/oilseeds/canola/2020/pdf/Quality-western-Canadian-canola-2020.pdf
  25. Canadian Grain Commission (CGC). Quality of western Canadian canola-2015. Winnipeg MB, Canada: Canadian Grain Commission; 2016. Available from: https://grainscanada.gc.ca/en/grain-research/export-quality/oilseeds/canola/2015/canola-quality-report-15.pdf
  26. Burbulis N, Kott LS. A new yellow-seeded canola genotype originating from double low black-seeded Brassica napus cultivars. Can J Plant Sci 2005;85:109-14. https://doi.org/10.4141/P04-030
  27. Damiran D, Lardner HA, Jefferson PG, Larson K, McKinnon JJ. Effects of supplementing spring-calving beef cows grazing barley crop residue with canola meal and wheat-based dry distillers grains with solubles on performance, reproductive efficiency, and system cost. Prof Anim Sci 2016;32:400-10.https://doi.org/10.15232/pas.2015-01479
  28. Theodoridou K, Yu P. Effect of processing conditions on the nutritive value of canola meal and presscake. Comparison of the yellow and brown-seeded canola meal with the brown-seeded canola presscake. J Sci Food Agric 2013;93:1986-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6004
  29. Tyrrell HF. Prediction of the energy value of feeds for lactation. In: Proceedings of Southwest Nutrition Conference; 2005. pp. 225-8.
  30. Li X, Zhang Y, Yu P. Association of bio-energy processing-induced protein molecular structure changes with CNCPS-based protein degradation and digestion of co-products in dairy cows. J Agric Food Chem 2016;64:4086-94. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00688
  31. Huang X. Improvements in nutritive value of canola meal with pelleting [Master's Thesis]. Saskatoon SK, Canada: University of Saskatchewan; 2015. Available from: https://sundog.usask.ca/record=b3851688