Animal Bioscience

  • 제36권8호
  • /
  • Pages.1209-1220
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of lactic acid bacteria isolated from the chicken digestive tract for potential use as poultry probiotics

  • Merisa Sirisopapong (School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology) ;
  • Takeshi Shimosato (Department of Biomolecular Innovation, Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Shinshu University) ;
  • Supattra Okrathok (School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology) ;
  • Sutisa Khempaka (School of Animal Technology and Innovation, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Suranaree University of Technology)
  • 투고 : 2022.12.02
  • 심사 : 2023.03.20
  • 발행 : 2023.08.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The use of probiotics as an alternative to antibiotics in animal feed has received considerable attention in recent decades. Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have remarkable functional properties promoting host health and are major microorganisms for probiotic purposes. The aim of this study was to characterize LAB strains of the chicken digestive tract and to determine their functional properties for further use as potential probiotics in poultry. Methods: A total of 2,000 colonies were isolated from the ileum and cecal contents of the chickens based on their phenotypic profiles and followed by a preliminary detection for acid and bile tolerance. The selected 200 LAB isolates with exhibited well-tolerance in acid and bile conditions were then identified by sequencing the 16S rDNA gene, followed by acid and bile tolerance, antimicrobial activity, adhesion to epithelial cells and additional characteristics on the removal of cholesterol. Then, the two probiotic strains (L. ingluviei and L. salivarious) which showed the greatest advantage in vitro testing were selected to assess their efficacy in broiler chickens. Results: It was found that 200 LAB isolates that complied with all measurement criteria belonged to five strains, including L. acidophilus (63 colonies), L. ingluviei (2 colonies), L. reuteri (58 colonies), L. salivarius (72 colonies), and L. saerimneri (5 colonies). We found that the L. ingluviei and L. salivarius can increase the population of LAB and Bifidobacterium spp. while reducing Enterobacteria spp. and Escherichia coli in the cecal content of chickens. Additionally, increased concentrations of valeric acid and short chain fatty acids were also observed. Conclusion: This study indicates that all five Lactobacillus strains isolated from gut contents of chickens are safe and possess probiotic properties, especially L. ingluviei and L. salivarius. Future studies should evaluate the potential for growth improvement in broilers.

키워드

과제정보

The authors would like to thank the Royal Golden Jubilee Ph.D. (RGJ-PHD) Program (grant number PHD/0105/2558), Thailand Science Research and Innovation (TSRI), Thailand. We would also like to thank Suranaree University of Technology (SUT), National Science, Research and Innovation Fund (NSRF), and the National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) (SUT3-303-59-12-07) for their financial support.

참고문헌

  1. Mottet A, Tempio G. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World Poult Sci J 2017;73:245-56. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043933917000071
  2. Aruwa CE, Pillay C, Nyaga MM, Sabiu S. Poultry gut health - microbiome functions, environmental impacts, microbiome engineering and advancements in characterization technologies. J Anim Sci Biotechnol 2021;12:119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40104-021-00640-9
  3. Ahmad R, Yu YH, Hsiao FSH, et al. Influence of heat stress on poultry growth performance, intestinal inflammation, and immune function and potential mitigation by probiotics. Animals 2022;12:2297. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12172297
  4. Clavijo V, Florez MJV. The gastrointestinal microbiome and its association with the control of pathogens in broiler chicken production: a review. Poult Sci 2018;97:1006-21. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex359
  5. Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, et al. Expert consensus document: the international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;11:506-14. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66
  6. Ashaolu TJ. Immune boosting functional foods and their mechanisms: a critical evaluation of probiotics and prebiotics. Biomed Pharmacother 2020;130:110625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110625
  7. Chen S, Luo S, Yan C. Gut microbiota implications for health and welfare in farm animals: a review. Animals 2022;12:93.https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010093
  8. Heravi RM, Kermanshahi H, Sankian M, et al. Screening of lactobacilli bacteria isolated from gastrointestinal tract of broiler chickens for their use as probiotic. Afr J Microbiol Res 2011;5:1858-68.
  9. Noohi N, Papizadeh M, Rohani M, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR. Screening for probiotic characters in lactobacilli isolated from chickens revealed the intra-species diversity of Lactobacillus brevis. Anim Nutr 2021;7:119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.005
  10. Al-Khalaifa H, Al-Nasser A, Al-Surayee T, et al. Effect of dietary probiotics and prebiotics on the performance of broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019;98:4465-79. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pez282
  11. Kizerwetter-Swida M, Binek M. Assessment of potentially probiotic properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from chickens. Pol J Vet Sci 2016;19:15-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjvs-2016-0003
  12. Ehrmann MA, Kurzak P, Bauer J, Vogel RF. Characterization of lactobacilli towards their use as probiotic adjuncts in poultry. J Appl Microbiol 2002;92:966-75. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01608.x
  13. Krysiak K, Konkol D, Korczynski M. Overview of the use of probiotics in poultry production. Animals 2021;11:1620. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061620
  14. Noohi N, Papizadeh M, Rohani M, Talebi M, Pourshafie MR. Screening for probiotic characters in lactobacilli isolated from chickens revealed the intra-species diversity of Lactobacillus brevis. Anim Nutr 2021;7:119-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.005
  15. Walker DK, Gilliland SE. Relationships among bile tolerance, bile salt deconjugation, and assimilation of cholesterol by Lactobacillus acidophilus. J Dairy Sci 1993;76:956-61. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(93)77422-6
  16. Nami Y, Abdullah N, Haghshenas B, Radiah D, Rosli R, Khosroushahi AY. Probiotic potential and biotherapeutic effects of newly isolated vaginal Lactobacillus acidophilus 36YL strain on cancer cells. Anaerobe 2014;28:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2014.04.012
  17. Pennacchia C, Vaughan EE, Villani F. Potential probiotic Lactobacillus strains from fermented sausages: further investigations on their probiotic properties. Meat Sci 2006;73:90-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.10.019
  18. Liong MT, Shah NP. Acid and bile tolerance and cholesterol removal ability of lactobacilli strains. J Dairy Sci 2005;88: 55-66. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72662-X
  19. National Research Council. Nutrient requirements of poultry. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press, 1994.
  20. Cobb-Vantress. Cobb 500 broiler performance and nutrition supplement. Siloam Springs, AR, USA: Cobb-Vantress Inc.; 2018.
  21. Sharmila A, Kasim A, Noor HM, Jahromi MF, Samsudin AA. Quantitative real-time PCR analysis of the caecal bacteria population of broiler chickens fed with corn-soy diet containing 20% of palm kernel meal with or without enzyme supplementation. J Anim Poult Sci 2015;4:1-9.
  22. Mookiah S, Sieo CC, Ramasamy K, Abdullah N, Ho YW. Effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotic and synbiotics on performance, caecal bacterial populations and caecal fermentation concentrations of broiler chickens. J Sci Food Agric 2014;94:341-8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6365
  23. Dowarah R, Verma AK, Agarwal N, Singh P, Singh BR. Selection and characterization of probiotic lactic acid bacteria and its impact on growth, nutrient digestibility, health and antioxidant status in weaned piglets. PloS one 2018;13:e0192978. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192978
  24. Mountzouris KC, Tsirtsikos P, Kalamara E, Nitsch S, Schatzmayr G, Fegeros K. Evaluation of the efficacy of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus, and Pediococcus strains in promoting broiler performance and modulating cecal microflora composition and metabolic activities. Poult Sci 2007;86:309-17. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.2.309
  25. Pique N, Berlanga M, Minana-Galbis D. Health benefits of heat-killed (Tyndallized) probiotics: an overview. Int J Mol Sci 2019;20:2534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20102534
  26. Morelli L. In vitro selection of probiotic lactobacilli: a critical appraisal. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol 2000;1:59-67.
  27. Svihus B. Function of the digestive system. J Appl Poult Res 2014;23:306-14. https://doi.org/10.3382/japr.2014-00937
  28. Hutari A, Jaseem WS, Hamid AA, Yusoff WMW. Screening of Lactobacillus strains against Salmonella both isolated from Malaysian free-range chicken intestine for use as probiotic. Sains Malays 2011;40:1115-22.
  29. Erkkila S, Petaja E. Screening of commercial meat starter cultures at low pH and in the presence of bile salts for potential probiotic use. Meat Sci 2000;55:297-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00156-4
  30. Pennacchia C, Ercolini D, Blaiotta G, Pepe O, Mauriello G, Villani F. Selection of Lactobacillus strains from fermented sausages for their potential use as probiotics. Meat Sci 2004; 67:309-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.11.003
  31. Vieco-Saiz N, Belguesmia Y, Raspoet R, et al. Benefits and inputs from lactic acid bacteria and their bacteriocins as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters during foodanimal production. Front Microbiol 2019;10:57. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00057
  32. Onwuakor CE, Nwaugo VO, Nnadi CJ, Emetole JM. Effect of varied culture conditions on crude supernatant (bacteriocin) production from four Lactobacillus species isolated from locally fermented maize (ogi). Am J Microbiol Res 2014;2:125-30. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajmr-2-5-1
  33. Dec M, Urban-Chmiel R, Stepien-Pysniak D, Wernicki A. Assessment of antibiotic susceptibility in Lactobacillus isolates from chickens. Gut Pathog 2017;9:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13099-017-0203-z
  34. Jose NM, Bunt CR, Hussain MA. Comparison of microbiological and probiotic characteristics of lactobacilli isolates from dairy food products and animal rumen contents. Microorganisms 2015;3:198-212. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms3020198
  35. Monteagudo-Mera A, Rastall RA, Gibson GR, Charalampopoulos D, Chatzifragkou A. Adhesion mechanisms mediated by probiotics and prebiotics and their potential impact on human health. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2019;103:6463-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09978-7
  36. Pringsulaka O, Rueangyotchanthana K, Suwannasai N, et al. In vitro screening of lactic acid bacteria for multi-strain probiotics. Livest Sci 2015;174:66-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.01.016
  37. Lye HS, Rusul G, Liong MT. Removal of cholesterol by lactobacilli via incorporation and conversion to coprostanol. J Dairy Sci 2010;93:1383-92. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2574
  38. Angelakis E, Bastelica D, Amara A, et al. An evaluation of the effects of Lactobacillus ingluviei on body weight, the intestinal microbiome and metabolism in mice. Microb Pathog 2012;52:61-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micpath.2011.10.004
  39. Shokryazdan P, Jahromi MF, Abdullah N, Liang JB. Probiotic potential of lactic acid bacteria isolated from mulberry silage. Life Sci J 2021;18:35-45. https://doi.org/10.7537/marslsj180721.06
  40. Sureshkumar S, Lee HC, Jung SK, et al. Inclusion of Lactobacillus salivarius strain revealed a positive effect on improving growth performance, fecal microbiota and immunological responses in chicken. Arch Microbiol 2021;203:847-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-020-02088-3
  41. Deleu S, Machiels K, Raes J, Verbeke K, Vermeire S. Short chain fatty acids and its producing organisms: An overlooked therapy for IBD? EBioMedicine 2021;66:103293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2021.103293
  42. Tsukagoshi M, Sirisopapong M, Namai F, et al. Lactobacillus ingluviei C37 from chicken inhibits inflammation in LPSstimulated mouse macrophages. Anim Sci J 2020;91:e13436. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.13436
  43. Qing Y, Xie H, Su C, et al. Gut microbiome, short-chain fatty acids, and mucosa injury in young adults with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Dig Dis Sci 2019;64:1830-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-018-5428-2
  44. Onrust L, Driessche K, Ducatelle R, Schwarzer K, Haesebrouck F, Van Immerseel F. Valeric acid glyceride esters in feed promote broiler performance and reduce the incidence of necrotic enteritis. Poult Sci 2018;97:2303-11. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps/pey085