This paper examines the dynamics of environmental policy development in Korea by reviewing some of the ways on how the policy windows have been opened. There are a lot of theoretical arguments about the major factors influencing policy development or changes. Many scholars have believed that severe pollution accidents or salient environmental episodes might have been the main motivation of environmental policy development. This line of argument seems valid, especially with the water pollution control policy in Korea. Water pollution control programs had rapidly expanded along with the series of water pollution accidents in the tap water sources from the late 1980s to mid-1990s. However, regarding other major env. issues, various other factors have played more important roles in the development of the relevant policies. In case of air pollution control policy international sport events such as, 1986 Asian Games, 1988 Summer Olympics, and 2002 World Cup Competition, have contributed for the development. The municipal solid waste management policy partly owed its development to the introduction of local autonomy system in the mid-1990s. Even the foreign currency crisis occurring in December 1997 helped the policy paradigm shift from rigid supply-oriented to soft demand-oriented approaches. After closely looking at the dynamics of environmental policy development in Korea, this paper tries to identify the logical background of the observed outcomes.

It is difficult to examine the causal relation of pollution damages because the time gap between pollution cause and effect is large and new pollutants are continuously being produced. Their many environmental effects are not promptly studied. As both the study of causal relation about pollution and the pollutant treatment are becoming highly advanced by the development of science and environmental technology, both the economy and balance on environmental regulation may be discussed. It is reasonable to decide environmental policy in consideration of close relation between both the generation and resolution of environmental problems and of technological developments because environmental problems are related to complicated social problems and scientific technologies. First item in policy decision about environmental control and management is preferentially to consider the way of prevention. It is necessary to prevent pollution by regulating the installment of environmental pollution facility into the environmentally sensitive areas, like water supply source and to regulate land utilization as a method to achieve pollution prevention. Second is a consideration of environmental technology development. This is a solution which can accomplish the development of environmental technology and the reinforcement of economic competition. Third is the coexistence of environment and economy. It is necessary to consider economy in connection with environmental problems and environment in economic problem. Then, we can enjoy a healthy life as well as economic affluence. Fourth is the enlargement of environmental management means. Environmental management means must be diversified because environmental cause and effect are varied. For Improving the land use regulation system, it is necessary to consider both land use regulation status and pollutant toxicity with the development of environmental technology. Land use must be approached by classifying land to 3 levels; water source protection zone and water front zone, special zone 1 and 2, rancus and other zones. Land regulation policy to prevent any accident in water source protection zone, waterfront zone, and special zone must be continuously upgraded. However, economical consideration in other zones is required by the development of environmental technology.

The objective of this study is to analyze the problems of disposal and collection, including administrative management of agricultural PE waste and suggest effective management measurements. Information regarding problems of agricultural PE waste management were collected from field survey of farmers, regional governments and officials. On the national level, the low ratio of collection for optimal treatment of agricultural PE waste is a critical problem. , the negative discharging behavior of farmers, an illegal incineration and landfill of farmers and a lack of education and extension etc. An ambiguity of the management principle to agricultural PE waste, the differences in management among the regional governments, a lack of will of the regional governments and officials to realize SARD and lack of education and extension etc. are some of the problems in administrative management of agricultural PE waste collection. The major suggestions of this study are as follows : (1) to strengthen education and extension, (2) to adopt an improved economic incentive system and strong, lawful regulation simultaneously, (3) to use temporang collection and permanent collection site, and (4) to organize "OTC(Optimal Treatment Conference)" composed of farmers, regional cooperative, PE producers etc. for operating an effective management system.

입도분포는 토양의 수리특성을 추정하는 데 많이 사용되고 있다. 본 연구는 다양한 가정조건을 가진 9개의 입도분포모형을 가지고 한국토양을 대상으로 어떤 모형이 가장 잘 입도분포를 모사하는지를 조사하였다. 4개의 추정변수를 가진 Fredlund모형, 로지스틱성장곡선, 그리고 Weibull분포가 다른 모형에 비해 PSD를 잘 모사하였다. 특히 추정변수가 없는 로지스틱 성장곡선 함수가 좋은 모사를 나타낸 것이 흥미로웠다.

토양오염기준은 토지이용별 또는 오염노출경로별 오염토양의 조사, 평가 및 복구를 위한 유용한 지침으로 이용될 수 있다. 이 연구에서는 한국을 포함한 몇몇 국가의 토양오염기준을 특히 중금속에 주안점을 두고 검토하였다. 또한 국내 일부 폐광산 지역의 환경오염 조사결과를 토양오염기준과 비교하며 평가하였다. 영국, 네덜란드, 독일, 캐나다, 일본 등의 국가에서는 복구우선순위 선정과 인체건강 및 생태계 보전을 위한 오염토양의 선별수단으로 토양오염기준을 개발하여 왔다. 국내에서는 1996년 토양환경보전법(시행규칙)의 시행에 따라 토양 오염기준 설정과 특정토양오염유발시설의 관리, 정기적 토양오염도 조사를 실시하고 있으며 이후 2001년 보완 개정되어 토양오염물질의 확대적용과 토양오염 조사, 관리 및 복원 방법의 보완이 이루어진 바 있다. 그럼에도 불구하고 현 중금속(Cd, Cu 및 Pb)의 오염기준을 적용할때 폐광산 지역의 폐기물과 이에 오염된 토양의 경우 다량의 중금속을 함유하고 있지만 오염지역으로 규정되지 않을 수도 있다. 이 연구 결과, 0.1N 염산용출법은 중금속의 토양 내 화학적 형태 중 일부 교환성 및 환원성 형태만을 추출하며 황화물 형태를 충분히 용출하지 못하고 있는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 장기적인 환경조건 변화에 따른 토양 내 중금속의 용출성 변화를 평가하기 위해서는 강산추출법이 요구되어진다. 따라서 폐광산지 역의 중금속에 의한 토양오염의 타당한 환경평가 결정을 위해 현 분석기법 외에 총함량 분석방법의 병행적용과 이에 따른 새로운 오염기준 설정 등이 필요한 것으로 제시되었다.

This study reviews the proposed liability and redress regime under the Cartagena Protocol on Biodiversity. Several core elements for the regime are discussed in comparison with those listed in the 1999 Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation for Damage resulting from the Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal. These are (1) scope of the rules and procedures; (2) channeling of liability; (3) legal standing; (4) definition of damage; (5) standard of care; (6) ancillary sources of compensation; (7) limitation of liability; (8) financial guarantees; and (9) mutual recognition and enforcement of judgments. Korea has given relatively little attention to the issue of liability and redress in the context of LMOs trade. As the Protocol is expected to enter into force soon, Korea needs to develop appropriate implementing domestic mechanisms for the Biosafety Protocol. Establishing an adequate domestic liability and compensation scheme will be one of the most important mechanisms not only to comply the Protocol but to ensure safety of LMOs in general. A further research is needed on the basis of a comparision of relevant legislations in different countries as well as analysis of current laws related to the accidents arising from LMOs trade, such as product liability laws, food safety laws, liability provisions in some environmental legislations.