The ASTM E9 standard provides specifications for metallic compression testing using specimens categorized as short, medium, or long specimens on their length-to-diameter ratios. For strong materials such as bearing metals, the standard specifies short specimens (length-to-diameter ratios of 0.8 or 2.0), while medium specimens (length-to-diameter ratio of 3.0) are commonly used for general metallic specimens. However, the metal additive manufacturing processes, which involve melting and rapid solidification, result in even traditional metals exhibiting high-strength properties. Consequently, for metal additive manufacturing specimens, consider using lower length-to-diameter ratios compared to the standard evaluation of general metallic samples, which typically use a length-to-diameter ratio of 3.0. Based on the experimental data, an ANOVA test was conducted to examine changes in compressive strength across various L/D ratios (length-to-diameter of 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5). The results indicated a statistically significant difference in compressive strength for ratios of 3.0 and above. Notably, L/D ratios of 2.0 and 2.5 yielded reliable compressive strength values, suggesting their optimal applicability in compression performance evaluations. The results of this study are expected to be used as important guideline for establishing standards and integrating specifications for reliable performance evaluation of metal additive manufacturing.