Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Effect of the Contents and Organization Characteristics on Learning Transfer and Organizational Effectiveness: A Comparison of On/Off Education on Franchise Enterprises

교육콘텐츠 특성과 기업 조직특성이 교육전이 및 조직효과성에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 프랜차이즈기업 대상의 온-오프라인 교육 훈련에 따른 비교

  • Kwon, Minhee (Dept. of Smart Convergence Consulting, Hansung University) ;
  • Lee, Sangbok (Division of Smart Management Engineering, Hansung University)
  • 권민희 (한성대학교 스마트융합컨설팅학과) ;
  • 이상복 (한성대학교 산업경영공학과)
  • Received : 2022.05.18
  • Accepted : 2022.08.20
  • Published : 2022.08.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Education for an organization is implemented to improve the organizational and each individual's performance. However, the actual results are not as expected. Accordingly, this study is committed to investigate the education related factors that have impact on the organizational performance, which is defined by the trainee's organizational commitment and work performance. Based on the acquired knowledge, we suggest things to consider when designing corporate training for performance creation. First, it is investigated whether the task value and job relevance(educational content characteristics) and the degree of support for education within the company(organizational characteristics) affect learning-transfer of trainees. After that, the causal relationship from the learning-transfer to organizational commitment and work performance(organizational effectiveness) is analyzed. In this overall process, the effect of on-/off-line education is analyzed and compared. As a result, it is found that the task value, the job relevance, and organizational compensation have a significant impact on the learning-transfer, and the learning-transfer has impact on organization commitment and work performance. In addition, the moderating effect of the on-/off- education is identified. This study is conducted only with franchise enterprises and as a future study, a more general sampling is required to extend this work.

기업 교육훈련은 조직구성원 및 조직의 성과 향상을 위해서 시행되나 실제 교육훈련의 성과는 기대한 만큼 나타나고 있지 않다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 기업 내 교육성과를 피교육자의 조직몰입도와 업무성과로 정의하고 이에 영향을 미치는 요인들에 대해 연구함으로써 성과 창출을 위해 기업 교육훈련 설계 시 고려해야 하는 것들을 제안한다. 우선 기업 교육훈련에서 제공되는 교육콘텐츠 특성으로서의 과제가치와 직무연관성, 그리고 기업 내 교육훈련에 대한 지원 정도인 조직특성이 피교육자의 교육전이에 영향을 끼치는 지 확인한다. 이후, 교육전이로부터 조직몰입 및 업무성과로의 인과관계를 분석한다. 이 과정에서 온/오프라인 교육의 조절효과가 있는지 분석하여 교육 전달 방법에 따른 효과성의 차이가 있는지 검증한다. 연구결과, 교육의 과제가치, 직무연관성, 조직보상이 교육전이에, 교육전이가 조직몰입 및 업무성과에 유의한 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으며, 온/오프라인 교육간 차이가 있음을 입증하였다. 본 연구는 프랜차이즈 기업을 대상으로 수행하여 표본의 한계가 존재하며, 향후 대표성을 지닌 표본이나 전문직종의 집단을 대상으로 연구를 확장할 예정이다.

Keywords

References

  1. J. U. Kwon & S. J. Kwon. (2015). A Mediation Effect of Self-Efficacy between Empowering Leadership and Innovative Behavior. Journal of Corporate Education and Talent Research, 17(1), 83-103.
  2. J. Y. Choi. (2020). Impact of social risk by COVID-19 on consumption psychology and consumption behavior. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  3. W. Y. Jeong. (2016). Mediating Effect of Training Transfer and Moderating Effect of Perceived Organizational Support in the Relationship between Training and Job Performance: Focusing on the Financial and Insurance Business. Doctoral dissertation. Chung-buk University, Chung-buk.
  4. J. Y. Kim. (2014). Now, companies must strengthen their disaster management capabilities: 100% government education expenses for training professionals in corporate disaster reduction activities. land and transportation.(Online) http://ltm.or.kr/2009/board.php?board=kkkmagazine&config=1&category=7&search=OPINION&shwhere=user_add22&command=body&no=2361&PHPSESSID=342215ee6b8f85bc4a5a51c61e04ecbc
  5. Y. J. Hur, J. H. Yoon & S. B. Cha. (2007). Relationships among Training Program Components, Characteristics of Organizational Situations, and Training Transfer: The Case of Family Restaurant. Journal of Tourism Sciences, 31(6), 53-74.
  6. A. Y. Ko. (2013). The Effects of Task-Value on Career Orientation and Types of Corporate Education and Training. The Graduate School. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  7. B. Y. Jung. (2020). A Study on the Effect of Education on Organizational Performance : In the Public and Private Organizations. The Graduate School. Seoul Nationa University, Seoul.
  8. J. H. Seo. (2014). An Analysis of the Effects of e-Learning based Program about Self-directed Learning for Teachers. The Graduate school. Soongsil University, Seoul.
  9. Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age (Vol. 9). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  10. J. Y. Lee & J. K. Lee. (2005). Conceptualizing E-Learning. Andragogy Today: International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education, 8(3), 1-31.
  11. E. H. Lee. (2016). The survey of satisfaction and preference for online and offline parallel education in the beauty education. The Graduate School. Kun-kook University, Seoul.
  12. Ostroff, C. (1991). Training effectiveness measures and scoring schemes: A comparison. Personnel Psychology, 44(2), 353-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00963.x
  13. Nadler. L. (1986). Designing Training Programs: The Critical Events Model. Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc. 7-11.
  14. G. H. Kim. (2008). Learning motivation, job relevance of content, organizational support, and relationship between learning transfer: Focusing on corporate e-learning. The Graduate school. Korea University, Seoul.
  15. Y. S. Park & J. Y. Ko. (2012). A study on the effect of the psychological characteristics and surrounding environment of restaurant founders on the learning transfer effect. Culinary Science & Hospitality Research, 18(1), 228-245. https://doi.org/10.20878/cshr.2012.18.1.017017017
  16. S. H. Joo & M. G. Seo. (2020). A Study on the Effect of Franchise Professional Education Program on Education Satisfaction and Education Transition. Journal of Franchising, 5(3), 39-57. DOI : 10.22985/kasof.2020.5.3.002
  17. E. K. Sung, M. M. Kim & M. G. Seo. (2019). Effect of the characteristics of franchise educational institutions and educational contents on educational transfer. Korea Society of Franchise Management, 10(3), 43-52. DOI : 10.21871/KJFM.2019.12.10.4.43
  18. S. G. Jo. (2017). A Study on the Influence of Characteristics of Educational Contents and Organizational Characteristics on Learning Transfer and Organizational Effectiveness. The Graduate school. Han-sung University, Seoul.
  19. H. J. Kim. (2003). A Emprical Research on motivation for effective d-learning performance in organization. The Graduate school. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  20. Brophy, J. (1983). Conceptualizing student motivation. Educational Psychology, 18(3), 200-215. DOI : 10.1080/00461528309529274
  21. H. S. Jung. (2005). Effects of Self-Directedness, Task Value, and Learning Types on Learner Satisfaction and Achievement. The Graduate school. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  22. M. H. Cho. (2011). A study on the search relations learner's factors(work experience as a teacher, ICT utilization ability, task value) and learning outcomes in Online Teacher Training. The graduate school. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  23. J. E. Kim. (2013). Predictability of Learning Transfer by the task value, organizational support, job relatedness in Corporatee-Learning. The graduate school. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  24. Bramley, P. (1991). Evaluating training effectiveness: Translating theory into practice. London : McGraw-Hill Companies.
  25. Holton, E. E. III. (1996). The flawed four-level evaluation model, Human Resource Development Quarterly, 7, 5-21. DOI : 10.1002/hrdq.3920070103
  26. Baldwin, T. T. & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel psychology, 41(1), 63-105. DOI : 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb00632.x
  27. Foxon, M. (1997). The influence of motivation to transfer, action planning, and manager support on the transfer process. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 10(2), 42-63. DOI : 10.1111/j.1937-8327.1997.tb00048.x
  28. Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of management review, 11(4), 736-749. DOI : 10.5465/amr.1986.4283922
  29. J. M. Kim, J. H. Lee & D. H. Kil. (2006). Relationship between learning transfer and transfer climate of rural guidance leader education program. Agricultural education and human resource development, 38(1), 27-52.
  30. Y. S. Hyun & D. B. Kwon. (2006). Case Study about HRD System and Training Programs of a Korean Company. The Korean Journal for Human Resource Development, 8(1), 1-24.
  31. Georgiou, P. (1973). The Goal Paradigm and Notes Toward a Counter Paradigm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(3), 291-310. DOI : 10.2307/2391665
  32. Yuchtman, E. & Seashore, S. E. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American sociological review, 891-903. DOI : 10.2307/2092843
  33. W. I. Joung. (2006). public organizational theory : comparison of construction organizations. Park Young Sa.
  34. Y. B. Jo. (2015). Effect of online education participants and program characteristics of hospital employees on effectiveness, self-efficacy, and moderating effect of organizational support. The thesis of master's degree, Inje University, Inje.
  35. J. E. Kim. (2013). Predictability of Learning Transfer by the task value, organizational support, job relatedness in Corporatee-Learning. The graduate school. Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  36. Brinkerhoff, B. O. & Montenino, M. U. (1995). Partnerships for training transfer: Lesson from a corporate study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 6(3), 263-274. DOI : 10.1002/hrdq.3920060305
  37. Tracey, J. B. Hinkin, T. R., Tannenbaum, S. I. & Mathieu, J. E. (2001). The influence of individual characteristics and the work environment on varying levels of training outcomes. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 12(1), 5-23. DOI : 10.1002/1532-1096(200101/02)12:1%3C5::AID-HRDQ2%3E3.0.CO;2-J
  38. Elangovan, A. R. & Karakowsky, L. (1999). The role of trainee and environmental factors in transfer of training: An exploratory Framework. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20(5), 268-275. DOI : 10.1108/01437739910287180
  39. E. M. Chang. (2008). A Study on Influence of organizational transter climate on transfer of traning. The graduate school. Chung-ang University, Seoul.
  40. H. J. Kim. (2000). The Effects of Personal Characteristics, Educational Programs, and Organizational Environment on Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Corporate Training :Focused on the Mediating Effects of Learning Transfer. Doctoral dissertation. Konkuk University. Seoul.
  41. Buckley, R. & Caple, J. (1995). The Training and Development Audit Evolves: Is Your Training and Development and Development Budget Wasted. Journal of European Industrial Training, 20(5), 68-79.
  42. Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett Jr, W., Traver, H., & Shotland, A. (1997). A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria. Personnel psychology, 50(2), 341-358. DOI : 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1997.tb00911.x
  43. S. Y. Chang. (2015). Effects of Education Training Factors on Transfer, self-efficacy and job performance for Airline Cabin Crews. : Organizational characteristics is moderating variables. The graduate school. Kyonggi University, Kyonggi.
  44. S. B. Cho & H. S. Kwon. (2007). Effect of transformative leadership on empowerment, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment of hotel employees. Korean Society of Hotel and Restaurant Tourism Management, 16(5), 63-76
  45. G. H. Park. (2011). Influence of College Educational Service Quality on Academic Motivation and Satisfaction : Focused on Comparison of Online/Offline Educational Services. Doctoral dissertation. Keimyung University, Seoul.
  46. S. B. Son. (2008). Comparative analysis of online and offline in-service training courses for infant and toddler teachers. Doctoral dissertation. Sungshin Women's University, Seoul.
  47. Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B. & Anderson, R. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Exploratory factor analysis.
  48. Hatcher, L. (1994). A step-by-step approach to using the SAS system for factor analysis and structural equationmodeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.