Animal Bioscience

  • 제37권5호
  • /
  • Pages.918-928
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2765-0189(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2765-0235(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Untargeted metabolomics using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry and chemometrics for analysis of non-halal meats adulteration in beef meat

  • 투고 : 2023.06.28
  • 심사 : 2023.11.02
  • 발행 : 2024.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: The adulteration of raw beef (BMr) with dog meat (DMr) and pork (PMr) becomes a serious problem because it is associated with halal status, quality, and safety of meats. This research aimed to develop an effective authentication method to detect non-halal meats (dog meat and pork) in beef using metabolomics approach. Methods: Liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) using untargeted approach combined with chemometrics was applied for analysis non-halal meats in BMr. Results: The untargeted metabolomics approach successfully identified various metabolites in BMr DMr, PMr, and their mixtures. The discrimination and classification between authentic BMr and those adulterated with DMr and PMr were successfully determined using partial least square-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) with high accuracy. All BMr samples containing non-halal meats could be differentiated from authentic BMr. A number of discriminating metabolites with potential as biomarkers to discriminate BMr in the mixtures with DMr and PMr could be identified from the analysis of variable importance for projection value. Partial least square (PLS) and orthogonal PLS (OPLS) regression using discriminating metabolites showed high accuracy (R2 >0.990) and high precision (both RMSEC and RMSEE <5%) in predicting the concentration of DMr and PMr present in beef indicating that the discriminating metabolites were good predictors. The developed untargeted LC-HRMS metabolomics and chemometrics successfully identified non-halal meats adulteration (DMr and PMr) in beef with high sensitivity up to 0.1% (w/w). Conclusion: A combination of LC-HRMS untargeted metabolomic and chemometrics promises to be an effective analytical technique for halal authenticity testing of meats. This method could be further standardized and proposed as a method for halal authentication of meats.

키워드

과제정보

The authors acknowledge Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan (LPDP), Indonesian Endowment Fund for Education, Ministry of Finance, Republic of Indonesia for supporting this research. The authors would also thank to PRTPP BRIN for facilitating LC-HRMS instrument.

참고문헌

  1. Martuscelli M, Serio A, Capezio O, Mastrocola D. Safety, quality and analytical authentication of halal meat products, with particular emphasis on salami: a review. Foods 2020;9:1111. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9081111
  2. Alzeer J, Rieder U, Hadeed KA. Good agricultural practices and its compatibility with Halal standards. Trends Food Sci Technol 2020;102:237-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.025
  3. Yuswan MH, Aizat WM, Desa MNM, et al. Improved gel-enhanced liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry by chemometrics for halal proteomics. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 2019;192:103825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2019.103825
  4. Hossain MAM, Uddin SMK, Sultana S, et al. Authentication of halal and kosher meat and meat products: analytical approaches, current progresses and future prospects. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2022;62:285-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1814691
  5. Pranata AW, Yuliana ND, Amalia L, Darmawan N. Volatilomics for halal and non-halal meatball authentication using solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Arab J Chem 2021;14:103146. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ARABJC.2021.103146
  6. Cao M, Han Q, Zhang J, et al. An untargeted and pseudotargeted metabolomic combination approach to identify differential markers to distinguish live from dead pork meat by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 2020;1610:460553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2019.460553
  7. Rahayu WS, Rohman A, Martono S, Sudjadi S. Application of FTIR spectroscopy and chemometrics for halal authentication of beef meatball adulterated with dog meat. Indones J Chem 2018;18:376-81. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijc.27159
  8. Jiang H, Ru Y, Chen Q, Wang J, Xu L. Near-infrared hyperspectral imaging for detection and visualization of offal adulteration in ground pork. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 2021;249:119307. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAA.2020.119307
  9. Ghazali HH, Tukiran NA. Analysis of pork adulteration in recycled frying oils using Raman spectroscopy. Malays J Halal Res 2021;4:14-7. https://doi.org/10.2478/mjhr-2021-0004
  10. Orbayinah S, Hermawan A, Sismindari, Rohman A. Detection of pork in meatballs using probe taqman real-time polymerase chain reaction. Food Res 2020;4:1563-8. https://doi.org/10.26656/fr.2017.4(5).227
  11. Perestam AT, Fujisaki KK, Nava O, Hellberg RS. Comparison of real-time PCR and ELISA-based methods for the detection of beef and pork in processed meat products. Food Control 2017;71:346-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2016.07.017
  12. Zhang M, Li Y, Zhang Y, et al. Rapid LC-MS/MS method for the detection of seven animal species in meat products. Food Chem 2022;371:131075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131075
  13. Muguruma Y, Nunome M, Inoue K. A review on the foodomics based on liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Chem Pharm Bull 2022;70:12-8. https://doi.org/10.1248/cpb.c21-00765
  14. Wang J, Xu Z, Zhang H, et al. Meat differentiation between pasture-fed and concentrate-fed sheep/goats by liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry combined with metabolomic and lipidomic profiling. Meat Sci 2021;173:108374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2020.108374
  15. Belhaj MR, Lawler NG, Hoffman NJ. Metabolomics and lipidomics: expanding the molecular landscape of exercise biology. Metabolites 2021;11:151. https://doi.org/10.3390/METABO11030151
  16. Bohme K, Calo-Mata P, Barros-Velazquez J, Ortea I. Recent applications of omics-based technologies to main topics in food authentication. Trends Analyt Chem 2019;110:221-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2018.11.005
  17. Selamat J, Rozani NAA, Murugesu S. Application of the metabolomics approach in food authentication. Molecules 2021;26:7565. https://doi.org/10.3390/MOLECULES26247565
  18. Cao S, Du H, Tang B, Xi C, Chen Z. Non-target metabolomics based on high-resolution mass spectrometry combined with chemometric analysis for discriminating geographical origins of Rhizoma Coptidis. Microchem J 2021;160:105685. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.MICROC.2020.105685
  19. Paul A, Harrington PDB. Chemometric applications in metabolomic studies using chromatography-mass spectrometry. Trends Analyt Chem 2021;135:116165. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TRAC.2020.116165
  20. Balkir P, Kemahlioglu K, Yucel U. Foodomics: a new approach in food quality and safety. Trends Food Sci Technol 2021;108:49-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.TIFS.2020.11.028
  21. Panseri S, Arioli F, Pavlovic R, et al. Impact of irradiation on metabolomics profile of ground meat and its implications toward food safety. LWT 2022;161:113305. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LWT.2022.113305
  22. Abbas N, Ali A, Kumari S, et al. Untargeted-metabolomics differentiation between poultry samples slaughtered with and without detaching spinal cord. Arab J Chem 2020;13:9081-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.10.032
  23. Sidwick KL, Johnson AE, Adam CD, Pereira L, Thompson DF. Use of liquid chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry and metabonomic profiling to differentiate between normally slaughtered and dead on arrival poultry meat. Anal Chem 2017;89:12131-6. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.7b02749
  24. Trivedi DK, Hollywood KA, Rattray NJW, et al. Meat, the metabolites: an integrated metabolite profiling and lipidomics approach for the detection of the adulteration of beef with pork. Analyst 2016;141:2155-64. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6AN00108D
  25. Windarsih A, Riswanto FDO, Bakar NKA, Yuliana ND, Dachriyanus, Rohman A. Detection of pork in beef meatballs using LC-HRMS based untargeted metabolomics and chemometrics for halal authentication. Molecules 2022;27:8325. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27238325
  26. Kausar T, Hanan E, Ayob O, Praween B, Azad Z. A review on functional ingredients in red meat products. Bioinformation 2019;15:358-63. https://doi.org/10.6026/97320630015358
  27. Elbir Z, Oz F. The assessment of commercial beef and chicken bouillons in terms of heterocyclic aromatic amines and some of their precursors. Int J Food Sci Technol 2021;56:504-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/IJFS.14666
  28. Leng T, Li F, Xiong L, Xiong Q, Zhu M, Chen Y. Quantitative detection of binary and ternary adulteration of minced beef meat with pork and duck meat by NIR combined with chemometrics. Food Control 2020;113:107203. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FOODCONT.2020.107203
  29. Guntarti A, Ayu Purbowati Z. Analysis of dog fat in beef sausage using FTIR (Fourier Transform Infrared) combined with chemometrics. Pharmaciana 2019;9:21-8. https://doi.org/10.12928/pharmaciana.v9i1.10467
  30. Rospond B, Chlopicka J. The biological function of L-carnitine and its content in the particular food examples. Przegl Lek 2013;70:85-91.
  31. Pebriana RB, Rohman A, Lukitaningsih E, Sudjadi. Development of FTIR spectroscopy in combination with chemometrics for analysis of rat meat in beef sausage employing three lipid extraction systems. Int J Food Prop 2017;20:1995-2005. https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2017.1361969
  32. Shen S, Huang J, Li T, et al. Untargeted and targeted metabolomics reveals potential marker compounds of an tea during storage. LWT 2022;154:112791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112791